Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
Sinatra versions before 2.0.2 could expose users to cross-site scripting on the default 400 Bad Request page when parameter parsing fails. For affected web applications, the business risk is browser-side compromise of users interacting with a vulnerable app. The source bundle provides no CVSS score and no evidence of active exploitation.
Executive priority
Treat as a targeted remediation item, especially for public Sinatra applications. It is not KEV-listed in the provided bundle, but XSS in a web framework can affect user trust and session security if vulnerable apps remain exposed.
Technical view
CVE-2018-11627 is an XSS issue in Sinatra before 2.0.2, triggered when a params parser exception is rendered through the 400 Bad Request response. Public references include a Sinatra issue, a fixing commit, and Red Hat advisories. The bundle does not provide CWE, CVSS, or complete downstream package mapping.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely in internet-facing Ruby web applications using Sinatra before 2.0.2, including downstream packaged deployments referenced by Red Hat advisories. The bundle does not identify specific vulnerable applications or distributions beyond those references.
Exploitation context
The bundle does not show KEV listing or active exploitation evidence. The described condition requires reaching an affected Sinatra application and causing a parameter parser exception that leads to unsafe 400 error-page rendering.
Researcher notes
Evidence is sparse: the source bundle gives the core affected range and trigger, but no CVSS, CWE, exploit status, or complete package matrix. Use the Sinatra issue and commit to understand the fix behavior without deriving exploit procedures.
Mitigation direction
- Upgrade Sinatra to 2.0.2 or later where feasible.
- Review Red Hat advisories for supported package updates.
- Check vendor guidance for downstream packages and backports.
- Avoid exposing verbose framework error output in production.
- Prioritize externally reachable Sinatra applications first.
Validation and detection
- Inventory applications using Sinatra and record installed versions.
- Confirm whether any instance runs Sinatra before 2.0.2.
- Check OS vendor packages against Red Hat advisory versions where applicable.
- Review production error handling for 400 Bad Request responses.
- Confirm fixes through dependency manifests and deployed artifact inspection.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CVE-2018-11627 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Unknown
- CVSS
- Not scored
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS and timeline data
No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://github.com/sinatra/sinatra/issues/1428CVE reference · x_refsource_MISC
- RHSA-2019:0315CVE reference · vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- RHSA-2019:0212CVE reference · vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- https://github.com/sinatra/sinatra/commit/12786867d6faaceaec62c7c2cb5b0e2dc074d71aCVE reference · x_refsource_MISC
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
