LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2018-11507: An issue was discovered in Free Lossless Image Format (FLIF) 0.3.

An issue was discovered in Free Lossless Image Format (FLIF) 0.3. An attacker can trigger a long loop in image_load_pnm in image/image-pnm.cpp.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysisunknown

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2018-11507 concerns FLIF 0.3, where a crafted image-processing path can trigger an unusually long loop. The main business concern is availability: services that accept untrusted images and process them with FLIF 0.3 could waste CPU or hang work queues. Public sources do not provide CVSS, confirmed exploitation, or a named fixed release.

Executive priority

Prioritize assessment if the business accepts external images and uses FLIF 0.3 in automated processing. Without evidence of active exploitation or a named severity score, this is not automatically critical, but availability risk can become material for public upload pipelines or high-volume media services.

Technical view

The CVE describes a long-loop condition in FLIF 0.3 within image_load_pnm in image/image-pnm.cpp. The available source detail is sparse and does not assign a CWE or CVSS score. Treat it as a potential denial-of-service issue in environments that parse attacker-controlled PNM-related input through the affected FLIF code path.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where FLIF 0.3 is used directly or embedded in image upload, conversion, thumbnailing, archival, or batch-processing workflows that handle untrusted image files. Organizations with no FLIF 0.3 usage or no untrusted image processing have limited apparent exposure based on the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The provided sources only state that an attacker can trigger a long loop. They do not confirm public exploitation, weaponized exploit availability, or CISA KEV listing. The practical impact appears availability-focused, but the exact trigger conditions and operational severity are not fully documented in the supplied bundle.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE description and the referenced FLIF GitHub issue. No CVSS, CWE, affected CPEs, patch version, or KEV status is provided. Avoid assuming memory corruption or code execution; the documented behavior is a long loop in image_load_pnm.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any direct or embedded use of FLIF 0.3.
  • Check FLIF project guidance and issue #509 for confirmed remediation.
  • Restrict untrusted image processing where FLIF 0.3 is present.
  • Apply CPU, timeout, and queue limits around image-processing workers.
  • Monitor image-processing jobs for hangs or abnormal runtime.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory services, libraries, containers, and build dependencies for FLIF 0.3.
  • Map whether those services process untrusted image uploads or batch files.
  • Review image-processing logs for repeated long-running FLIF jobs.
  • Confirm whether PNM loading paths are reachable in production workflows.
  • Document findings and remediation status in the vulnerability register.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2018-11507 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.