LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2018-1124: procps-ng before version 3.3.15 is vulnerable to multiple integer overflows leading to a heap corruption in...

procps-ng before version 3.3.15 is vulnerable to multiple integer overflows leading to a heap corruption in file2strvec function. This allows a privilege escalation for a local attacker who can create entries in procfs by starting processes, which could result in crashes or arbitrary code execution in proc utilities run by other users.

HighCVSS 7.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2018-1124 affects procps-ng, a common Linux process-utility package. A local user could trigger integer overflows that corrupt heap memory when another user runs affected proc utilities, potentially causing crashes or code execution with that user’s privileges.

Executive priority

Treat as high priority for multi-user Linux environments because it can turn local access into broader impact. Internet-only exposure is not indicated by the sources, so remediation should focus on authenticated-user risk, shared infrastructure, and vendor patch compliance.

Technical view

The issue is multiple integer overflows in procps-ng file2strvec, classified as CWE-190 and CWE-122. Sources describe procps-ng before 3.3.15 as vulnerable. CVSS 3.0 is 7.3, with local attack vector, low complexity, low privileges, required user interaction, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant on Linux systems running vulnerable procps-ng packages, especially shared servers, multi-user environments, and systems where privileged users or automation run proc utilities. Distribution backports may change version strings, so validate against vendor advisories, not upstream version alone.

Exploitation context

The bundle includes an Exploit-DB reference, so public exploit material exists. CISA KEV is false in the provided data, and no cited source in the bundle states active in-the-wild exploitation. Exploitation requires local access and another user interaction path involving affected utilities.

Researcher notes

Key uncertainty is exact downstream affected package versions because distributions often backport fixes. The source bundle supports upstream procps-ng before 3.3.15, heap corruption via file2strvec, local privilege context, and public exploit availability, but not confirmed active exploitation.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply the procps-ng security updates from your Linux distribution vendor.
  • Confirm systems are fixed according to Ubuntu, Debian, Gentoo, or Red Hat advisories.
  • Prioritize shared Linux hosts and systems with untrusted local users.
  • Review appliances or bundled products that include procps-ng for vendor updates.
  • If no vendor package is available, check vendor guidance before applying manual fixes.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Linux systems for installed procps-ng packages.
  • Compare installed package releases against the relevant distribution advisory.
  • Identify shared hosts where untrusted users can start processes.
  • Check whether privileged users or scheduled jobs run proc utilities on those hosts.
  • Track remediation evidence in patch or configuration management records.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
9

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-122: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-190: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2018-1124 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.3 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
18Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.3CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.35.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

7.3High
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2018-1124Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
[UNKNOWN]procps-ngprocps-ng 3.3.15Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-122 · source CWE mapping

Heap-based Buffer Overflow

Heap-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-190 · source CWE mapping

Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Integer Overflow or Wraparound represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.