LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2018-10705: The Owned smart contract implementation for Aurora DAO (AURA), an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows attackers to...

The Owned smart contract implementation for Aurora DAO (AURA), an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows attackers to acquire contract ownership because the setOwner function is declared as public. An attacker can then conduct a lockBalances() denial of service attack.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2018-10705 concerns the Aurora DAO AURA ERC20 token smart contract. A public ownership-setting function could let an attacker become contract owner, then use owner powers to lock balances and deny service to token users.

Executive priority

Prioritize if the organization holds AURA, provides AURA services, or depends on token transferability. The business risk is asset availability disruption, not confirmed widespread enterprise software exposure.

Technical view

The CVE describes an Owned smart contract implementation where setOwner is public. That access-control failure allows unauthorized ownership takeover. The stated downstream impact is use of lockBalances() to cause denial of service. No CVSS, CWE, CPE, patch, or version range is provided in the bundle.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to Aurora DAO AURA token contracts or systems directly depending on them. The source bundle does not identify broader affected products, versions, package names, or CPEs.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. Public details disclose the vulnerable access-control condition and resulting denial-of-service impact, so exposed on-chain contracts should be treated as practically inspectable.

Researcher notes

Evidence is narrow but clear on the root cause: missing ownership authorization in a smart contract. The bundle lacks patch status, affected deployment addresses, version data, and exploit telemetry, so validation requires contract-level review.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Aurora DAO or PeckShield guidance for any official remediation path.
  • Identify whether business systems hold, accept, or depend on AURA token balances.
  • Avoid new operational dependency on affected immutable contracts until reviewed.
  • Consider migration or replacement if the deployed contract remains vulnerable.
  • Monitor contract ownership and balance-locking events for suspicious changes.

Validation and detection

  • Review the deployed contract source or verified bytecode for a public setOwner function.
  • Confirm whether ownership can be changed without current-owner authorization.
  • Check whether lockBalances-style owner functionality exists in the deployed contract.
  • Inventory wallets, integrations, exchanges, or accounting systems touching AURA.
  • Document whether compensating controls or migration plans exist.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2018-10705 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.