Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2018-10425 affects Shanghai 2345 Security Guard 3.7.0. A local user may bypass intended protections around key security processes and terminate them. For executives, the concern is reduced endpoint protection after a user or attacker already has local access, not remote entry by itself.
Executive priority
Treat this as a targeted endpoint-hardening issue. It is not described as remote code execution, but it can weaken security controls after local access. Prioritize environments where this product is still deployed or where endpoint tampering risk is high.
Technical view
The CVE describes a local process-protection bypass in 2345MPCSafe.exe, 2345SafeTray.exe, and 2345Speedup.exe. The issue is attributed to improper consideration of SetParent, allowing local users to terminate protected processes. No CVSS, CWE, vendor advisory, or fixed version is provided in the source bundle.
Likely exposure
Exposure appears limited to systems running Shanghai 2345 Security Guard 3.7.0. The provided affected-product metadata is incomplete, so inventory should rely on installed software records and the named executable components.
Exploitation context
The source describes local-user exploitation only. The provided data does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed in-the-wild exploitation. A public GitHub reference labeled as a PoC is included, but operational exploit details should not be assumed beyond that.
Researcher notes
Evidence is sparse. The CVE record names the product, version, components, local user requirement, process-termination impact, and SetParent-related cause. It does not provide CVSS, CWE, patch status, or vendor mitigation. Avoid expanding scope beyond Shanghai 2345 Security Guard 3.7.0 without additional sources.
Mitigation direction
- Check vendor guidance for patched or supported versions.
- Remove or replace unsupported Shanghai 2345 Security Guard installations.
- Restrict local user privileges on affected endpoints.
- Monitor for unexpected termination of named 2345 processes.
- Prioritize endpoint hardening where local attacker access is plausible.
Validation and detection
- Inventory endpoints for Shanghai 2345 Security Guard 3.7.0.
- Check for 2345MPCSafe.exe, 2345SafeTray.exe, and 2345Speedup.exe.
- Review endpoint logs for unexpected process termination events.
- Confirm whether any vendor patch or replacement version is available.
- Document findings because public affected-product metadata is incomplete.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CVE-2018-10425 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Unknown
- CVSS
- Not scored
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS and timeline data
No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://github.com/rebol0x6c/2345pocCVE reference · x_refsource_MISC
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.