LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2018-10220: Glastopf 3.1.3-dev has SSRF, as demonstrated by the abc.php a parameter.

Glastopf 3.1.3-dev has SSRF, as demonstrated by the abc.php a parameter. NOTE: the vendor indicates that this is intentional behavior because the product is a web application honeypot, and modules/handlers/emulators/rfi.py supports Remote File Inclusion emulation

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Discuss exposureBack to CVEs
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysisunknown

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE reports server-side request forgery behavior in Glastopf 3.1.3-dev. The important nuance is that the vendor described the behavior as intentional because Glastopf is a web application honeypot that emulates Remote File Inclusion. Treat this as an exposure review issue, not a confirmed emergency patch event.

Executive priority

Low to moderate unless Glastopf is deployed with broad outbound access or near sensitive internal systems. Prioritize confirming isolation and egress controls rather than assuming a conventional application vulnerability response.

Technical view

The record describes SSRF demonstrated through the abc.php a parameter in Glastopf 3.1.3-dev. The CVE notes vendor disagreement: modules/handlers/emulators/rfi.py intentionally supports Remote File Inclusion emulation. No CVSS, CWE, patch, or affected CPE data is provided in the source bundle.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to environments running Glastopf 3.1.3-dev, especially internet-facing honeypots with outbound network access. Business impact depends on whether the honeypot can reach internal services, metadata endpoints, or trusted network segments.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or other evidence of active exploitation. Public details are sparse and centered on reported SSRF-like behavior that the vendor says is part of honeypot emulation.

Researcher notes

This record is unusual because the reported behavior overlaps with intended honeypot functionality. The key research question is operational boundary control: whether emulated RFI can be abused to make unwanted outbound requests from trusted network locations.

Mitigation direction

  • Check current vendor guidance before treating this as a patchable product flaw.
  • Inventory any Glastopf 3.1.3-dev deployments and their network placement.
  • Restrict honeypot outbound access to only expected research destinations.
  • Isolate honeypots from internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, and management networks.
  • Monitor honeypot egress for unexpected destinations or high-volume requests.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether Glastopf 3.1.3-dev is deployed anywhere in the environment.
  • Review network ACLs and firewall rules controlling honeypot egress.
  • Verify the honeypot cannot reach internal-only services or metadata endpoints.
  • Review logs for unexpected outbound requests initiated by the honeypot.
  • Document whether RFI emulation is intentionally enabled for research purposes.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Public sources used

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2018-10220 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.