LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2018-1000613: Legion of the Bouncy Castle Legion of the Bouncy Castle Java Cryptography APIs 1.58 up to but not including...

Legion of the Bouncy Castle Legion of the Bouncy Castle Java Cryptography APIs 1.58 up to but not including 1.60 contains a CWE-470: Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection') vulnerability in XMSS/XMSS^MT private key deserialization that can result in Deserializing an XMSS/XMSS^MT private key can result in the execution of unexpected code. This attack appear to be exploitable via A handcrafted private key can include references to unexpected classes which will be picked up from the class path for the executing application. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 1.60 and later.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

Some Java applications using Bouncy Castle 1.58 or 1.59 could run unexpected code when processing a malicious XMSS or XMSS^MT private key. The issue is serious where applications import private keys from users or external systems, but the sources do not show broad active exploitation. Exposure is most likely in Java applications or bundled products using Bouncy Castle 1.58 or 1.59 and accepting externally supplied XMSS/XMSS^MT private keys. Transitive dependency exposure is possible through vendor products listed in advisories. Prioritize remediation where Java services handle externally supplied private keys or rely on affected vendor products. For internal-only systems without XMSS/XMSS^MT key import paths, treat as dependency hygiene with targeted validation. Mitigation focus: Upgrade Bouncy Castle Java Cryptography APIs to version 1.60 or later.; Apply vendor updates for affected Oracle, NetApp, openSUSE, or downstream products.; Avoid deserializing externally supplied XMSS/XMSS^MT private keys until patched..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2018-1000613 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
11Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.