LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2018-1000089: Anymail django-anymail version version 0.2 through 1.3 contains a CWE-532, CWE-209 vulnerability in WEBHOOK...

Anymail django-anymail version version 0.2 through 1.3 contains a CWE-532, CWE-209 vulnerability in WEBHOOK_AUTHORIZATION setting value that can result in An attacker with access to error logs could fabricate email tracking events. This attack appear to be exploitable via If you have exposed your Django error reports, an attacker could discover your ANYMAIL_WEBHOOK setting and use this to post fabricated or malicious Anymail tracking/inbound events to your app. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in v1.4.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Older django-anymail versions could expose the webhook authorization value in Django error reports or logs. If an attacker can see those reports, they could use the leaked setting to send fake tracking or inbound email events to the application.

Executive priority

Treat this as a focused remediation item for applications using older django-anymail. Business urgency increases if error reports or logs were externally reachable, because email workflow records may have been manipulated.

Technical view

CVE-2018-1000089 affects Anymail django-anymail 0.2 through 1.3. The issue is described as CWE-532 and CWE-209 involving disclosure of the WEBHOOK_AUTHORIZATION setting value through error reporting, enabling fabricated or malicious Anymail webhook events. The source states it was fixed in v1.4.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to Django applications running django-anymail 0.2 through 1.3, especially where Django error reports or logs containing ANYMAIL_WEBHOOK or WEBHOOK_AUTHORIZATION were exposed to unauthorized users.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show active exploitation or KEV listing. The described attack requires access to exposed Django error reports or logs, then use of the leaked webhook authorization value to submit fraudulent email events.

Researcher notes

The source data lacks CVSS, CPE detail, and confirmed exploitation evidence. Analysis should center on version confirmation, secret exposure paths, log accessibility, and whether downstream business logic trusts Anymail webhook events.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade django-anymail to v1.4 or later.
  • Restrict access to Django error reports and application logs.
  • Rotate any exposed Anymail webhook authorization value.
  • Review vendor release notes and commit details before deploying fixes.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory applications using django-anymail 0.2 through 1.3.
  • Check whether Django error reports were publicly exposed.
  • Search historical logs for leaked ANYMAIL_WEBHOOK or WEBHOOK_AUTHORIZATION values.
  • Review webhook event records for suspicious fabricated tracking or inbound events.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2018-1000089 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.