LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2018-0297: A vulnerability in the detection engine of Cisco Firepower Threat Defense software could allow an unauthent...

A vulnerability in the detection engine of Cisco Firepower Threat Defense software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) Access Control (AC) policy to block SSL traffic. The vulnerability is due to the incorrect handling of TCP SSL packets received out of order. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted SSL connection through the affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass a configured SSL AC policy to block SSL traffic. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg09316.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

CVE-2018-0297 is a Cisco Firepower Threat Defense policy-bypass flaw. A remote unauthenticated attacker could get SSL traffic through a device even when an SSL Access Control policy is configured to block it. The business risk is failed enforcement of a network security control, not direct system takeover based on the provided sources. Exposure is likely limited to Cisco Firepower Threat Defense deployments that use SSL Access Control policies to block SSL traffic. The bundle does not provide affected version ranges, CPEs, or configuration prerequisites beyond the presence of a configured SSL AC blocking policy. Treat this as a control-integrity issue. It can undermine an intended SSL blocking policy, especially at network boundaries, but the supplied evidence does not support critical urgency or active exploitation claims. Mitigation focus: Review Cisco's advisory for affected releases, fixed software, or workarounds.; Inventory Firepower Threat Defense devices enforcing SSL Access Control blocks.; Prioritize remediation on perimeter or segmentation devices relying on SSL blocking..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-693: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2018-0297 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/aCisco Firepower Threat Defense SoftwareCisco Firepower Threat Defense SoftwareListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-693 · source CWE mapping

Protection Mechanism Failure

Protection Mechanism Failure represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.