LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-8441: Elastic X-Pack Security versions prior to 5.4.1 and 5.3.3 did not always correctly apply Document Level Sec...

Elastic X-Pack Security versions prior to 5.4.1 and 5.3.3 did not always correctly apply Document Level Security to index aliases. This bug could allow a user with restricted permissions to view data they should not have access to when performing certain operations against an index alias.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw could let a restricted Elasticsearch user see data they were not meant to access when using certain index aliases. The business risk is unauthorized disclosure, especially where Document Level Security separates customer, tenant, or sensitive records.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted confidentiality issue. Prioritize environments where Elasticsearch stores sensitive, regulated, customer, or tenant-separated data and where users rely on Document Level Security for access control.

Technical view

Elastic X-Pack Security before 5.4.1 and 5.3.3 did not always enforce Document Level Security on index aliases. Under certain alias operations, an authenticated user with restricted permissions could view documents outside their authorization boundary. The CVE maps to CWE-279.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running Elastic X-Pack Security versions prior to 5.4.1 or 5.3.3 and using Document Level Security with index aliases. Systems without X-Pack Security, DLS, or alias-based access paths are not indicated as affected by the sources.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not report active exploitation, and the CVE is not marked as CISA KEV. Exploitation would require a user context with restricted permissions and access to affected alias operations, based on the CVE description.

Researcher notes

The sources identify the affected product, version boundary, and authorization failure pattern, but provide limited operational detail. Avoid assuming unauthenticated access, remote code execution, or broad Elasticsearch exposure. Focus assessment on DLS, aliases, and restricted-user data visibility.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade X-Pack Security to 5.4.1, 5.3.3, or a later fixed release.
  • Review Elastic vendor security guidance for version-specific remediation details.
  • Audit roles using Document Level Security with index aliases.
  • Restrict alias access where DLS-enforced data boundaries are required.
  • Review logs for unusual alias-based reads by restricted users.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Elasticsearch clusters running X-Pack Security before 5.4.1 or 5.3.3.
  • Identify roles that combine Document Level Security with index aliases.
  • Confirm upgraded clusters report fixed Elastic Stack versions.
  • Test DLS authorization behavior in a non-production environment.
  • Review access logs for restricted users querying sensitive aliases.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-279: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-8441 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
ElasticX-Pack Securityprior to 5.4.1 and 5.3.3Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-279 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Execution-Assigned Permissions

Incorrect Execution-Assigned Permissions represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.