LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-6900: An issue was discovered in Riello NetMan 204 14-2 and 15-2.

An issue was discovered in Riello NetMan 204 14-2 and 15-2. The issue is with the login script and wrongpass Python script used for authentication. When calling wrongpass, the variables $VAL0 and $VAL1 should be enclosed in quotes to prevent the potential for Bash command injection. Further to this, VAL0 and VAL1 should be sanitised to ensure they do not contain malicious characters. Passing it the username of '-' will cause it to time out and log the user in because of poor error handling. This will log the attacker in as an administrator where the telnet / ssh services can be enabled, and the credentials for local users can be reset. Also, login.cgi accepts the username as a GET parameter, so login can be achieved by browsing to the /cgi-bin/login.cgi?username=-%20a URI.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This vulnerability affects Riello NetMan 204 devices identified as versions 14-2 and 15-2. A flaw in the login handling can let an unauthenticated attacker become an administrator. That could expose UPS/network-management operations, allow service changes, and let local user credentials be reset.

Executive priority

Prioritize exposed NetMan 204 devices because the described flaw can grant administrator control without valid credentials. If these devices support critical power infrastructure, handle remediation as an operational security issue, not just an IT web bug.

Technical view

The authentication path uses login.cgi and a wrongpass Python script. User-controlled values are passed without proper quoting or sanitization, creating Bash command injection risk. Poor error handling can treat a failure condition as successful authentication, granting administrator access. The source also states the username is accepted through a GET parameter.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Riello NetMan 204 management interfaces running versions 14-2 or 15-2 are reachable from untrusted networks.

Exploitation context

The provided sources describe a practical authentication bypass and command injection condition, but the bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation evidence. Treat public-facing devices as urgent because successful abuse grants administrator access.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strong on vulnerability mechanics but incomplete on vendor fix status, CVSS, CPE data, and active exploitation. Avoid assuming broader Riello product impact beyond NetMan 204 14-2 and 15-2 unless vendor documentation confirms it.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any Riello NetMan 204 devices and confirm firmware versions.
  • Check Riello or reseller guidance for fixed firmware or supported remediation.
  • Restrict management access to trusted administrative networks only.
  • Disable unnecessary telnet or SSH services where operationally possible.
  • Review and rotate local device credentials after suspected exposure.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory NetMan 204 devices across facilities and network segments.
  • Confirm whether versions 14-2 or 15-2 are present.
  • Verify management CGI endpoints are not reachable from the internet.
  • Review device logs for unexpected administrator logins or service enablement.
  • Check for recent local user credential changes on affected devices.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-6900 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.