LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-6742: A vulnerability in the SNMP implementation of could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to cause a relo...

A vulnerability in the SNMP implementation of could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to cause a reload of the affected system or to remotely execute code. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted SNMP packet to the affected device.  The vulnerability is due to a buffer overflow in the affected code area. The vulnerability affects all versions of SNMP (versions 1, 2c, and 3). The attacker must know the SNMP read only community string (SNMP version 2c or earlier) or the user credentials (SNMPv3). An exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code and obtain full control of the system or to cause a reload of the affected system. Only traffic directed to the affected system can be used to exploit this vulnerability.

HighCVSS 8.8Known exploitedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is a serious Cisco IOS XE SNMP flaw in network devices. An attacker with the SNMP community string or SNMPv3 credentials could crash the device or potentially take full control. Because CISA lists CVE-2017-6742 in KEV, treat remaining exposure as urgent, especially on internet-reachable or broadly reachable management interfaces.

Executive priority

Treat as an urgent network-infrastructure remediation item. The vulnerability can affect core availability and device control, and KEV status means delayed remediation carries real operational risk. Prioritize externally reachable and shared-management-network devices first.

Technical view

CVE-2017-6742 is a CWE-119 buffer overflow in Cisco IOS XE SNMP handling affecting SNMPv1, v2c, and v3. It is remotely reachable over the network, requires low privileges, and no user interaction. Crafted SNMP traffic directed at the device may trigger reload or arbitrary code execution with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely where Cisco IOS XE devices run affected 3.xS, 3.xE, or 16.x versions and SNMP is enabled. Risk increases when SNMP is reachable beyond a tightly controlled management network, or where read-only community strings or SNMPv3 credentials may be known, reused, or weakly protected.

Exploitation context

CISA KEV status supports known exploitation in the wild. The provided sources do not include exploit details, observed campaigns, or proof-of-concept maturity. Exploitation requires SNMP access and valid community string or SNMPv3 credentials, but successful exploitation can cause reload or full device compromise.

Researcher notes

The bundle confirms Cisco IOS XE impact, SNMP authentication prerequisite, all SNMP versions affected, CVSS 8.8, CWE-119, and KEV status. It does not provide fixed-release details, exploit telemetry, or product-specific configuration mitigations, so validation should stay tied to Cisco advisory data.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Cisco advisory for affected releases and fixed software guidance.
  • Prioritize upgrade or remediation for devices matching affected IOS XE versions.
  • Restrict SNMP access to trusted management hosts and networks.
  • Rotate exposed SNMP community strings or credentials after remediation.
  • Disable unnecessary SNMP where business operations allow.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Cisco IOS XE versions across routers, switches, and network appliances.
  • Confirm whether SNMPv1, v2c, or v3 is enabled on each device.
  • Verify SNMP reachability from untrusted, user, partner, and internet-facing networks.
  • Compare device software versions against Cisco advisory affected version data.
  • Review logs for unexpected SNMP traffic, reloads, or management-plane anomalies.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-119: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-6742 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.0)
Known Exploited
Yes
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CISA KEV status

Status
Known exploited
Source
CISA / ADP
Date added
Not provided

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2017-6742Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco IOS XE Software3.7.0S, 3.7.1S, 3.7.2S, 3.7.3S, 3.7.4S, 3.7.5S, 3.7.6S, 3.7.7S, 3.7.4aS, 3.7.2tS, 3.7.0bS, 3.8.0S, 3.8.1S, 3.8.2S, 3.9.1S, 3.9.0S, 3.9.2S, 3.9.0aS, 3.11.1S, 3.11.2S, 3.11.0S, 3.11.3S, 3.11.4S, 3.12.0S, 3.12.1S, 3.12.2S, 3.12.3S, 3.12.0aS, 3.12.4S, 3.13.0S, 3.13.1S, 3.13.2S, 3.13.3S, 3.13.4S, 3.13.5S, 3.13.2aS, 3.13.0aS, 3.13.5aS, 3.13.6S, 3.13.7S, 3.13.6aS, 3.13.7aS, 3.6.3E, 3.6.6E, 3.6.5bE, 3.14.0S, 3.14.1S, 3.14.2S, 3.14.3S, 3.14.4S, 3.15.0S, 3.15.1S, 3.15.2S, 3.15.1cS, 3.15.3S, 3.15.4S, 3.7.4E, 3.7.5E, 3.16.0S, 3.16.1S, 3.16.1aS, 3.16.2S, 3.16.0cS, 3.16.3S, 3.16.2bS, 3.16.4aS, 3.16.4bS, 3.16.5S, 3.16.4dS, 3.17.0S, 3.17.1S, 3.17.2S, 3.17.1aS, 3.17.3S, 16.2.1, 16.2.2, 16.3.1, 16.3.2, 16.3.3, 16.3.1a, 16.3.4, 16.4.1, 16.4.2, 16.5.1, 16.5.1b, 3.18.0aS, 3.18.0S, 3.18.1S, 3.18.0SP, 3.18.1SP, 3.18.1aSP, 3.18.2aSPListed
IntelliShieldUniversal ProductN/AListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-119 · source CWE mapping

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.