LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-5585: OpenText Documentum Content Server (formerly EMC Documentum Content Server) 7.3, when PostgreSQL Database i...

OpenText Documentum Content Server (formerly EMC Documentum Content Server) 7.3, when PostgreSQL Database is used and return_top_results_row_based config option is false, does not properly restrict DQL hints, which allows remote authenticated users to conduct DQL injection attacks and execute arbitrary DML or DDL commands via a crafted request. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-2520.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

This flaw affects OpenText Documentum Content Server 7.3 in a specific PostgreSQL configuration. An authenticated remote user could abuse DQL handling to run database modification or schema commands. That creates material risk to stored content integrity and repository operations, but the provided sources do not show active exploitation. Exposure appears limited to OpenText Documentum Content Server 7.3 deployments using PostgreSQL with return_top_results_row_based set to false. The attacker must already authenticate remotely, so internet exposure matters less than account compromise, weak access control, or broad internal user access. Treat this as a high-priority integrity risk if Documentum 7.3 with PostgreSQL is present. The main business concern is unauthorized alteration of repository data or database structure by an authenticated user. Mitigation focus: Identify any Documentum Content Server 7.3 instances using PostgreSQL.; Avoid the vulnerable false configuration where operationally supported.; Check OpenText guidance for fixed builds or supported configuration changes..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-5585 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
1Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.