LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-3210: Applications developed using the Portrait Display SDK, versions 2.30 through 2.34, default to insecure configurations which allow arbitrary code execution

Applications developed using the Portrait Display SDK, versions 2.30 through 2.34, default to insecure configurations which allow arbitrary code execution. A number of applications developed using the Portrait Displays SDK do not use secure permissions when running. These applications run the component pdiservice.exe with NT AUTHORITY/SYSTEM permissions. This component is also read/writable by all Authenticated Users. This allows local authenticated attackers to run arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges. The following applications have been identified by Portrait Displays as affected: Fujitsu DisplayView Click: Version 6.0 and 6.01. The issue was fixed in Version 6.3. Fujitsu DisplayView Click Suite: Version 5. The issue is addressed by patch in Version 5.9. HP Display Assistant: Version 2.1. The issue was fixed in Version 2.11. HP My Display: Version 2.0. The issue was fixed in Version 2.1. Philips Smart Control Premium: Versions 2.23, 2.25. The issue was fixed in Version 2.26.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw turns vulnerable monitor/display utility software into a local privilege escalation path. Someone who already has a valid local account on an affected Windows system could abuse a writable SYSTEM-level service component and gain full machine control.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority endpoint hygiene issue where affected software exists. It requires local access, but successful abuse grants SYSTEM-level control, which can materially worsen compromise impact.

Technical view

Applications built with Portrait Display SDK versions 2.30 through 2.34 used insecure default permissions. The pdiservice.exe component runs as NT AUTHORITY/SYSTEM and is read/writable by all Authenticated Users, enabling local authenticated arbitrary code execution as SYSTEM.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on Windows endpoints with affected display utilities: Fujitsu DisplayView Click, Fujitsu DisplayView Click Suite, HP Display Assistant, HP My Display, or Philips Smart Control Premium versions named in the advisory.

Exploitation context

The sources describe local authenticated exploitation leading to SYSTEM privileges. The bundle does not cite active exploitation, public weaponization, KEV listing, or remote unauthenticated attack paths.

Researcher notes

This is CWE-276: incorrect default permissions. The key condition is a SYSTEM-running component writable by Authenticated Users. Evidence is strong for listed products and versions, but the bundle provides no CVSS score or current exploitation telemetry.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected applications to the fixed versions named by Portrait Displays.
  • Remove affected display utilities where they are not required.
  • Check vendor advisories for any additional supported remediation guidance.
  • Prioritize managed endpoint fleets where standard users can log in locally.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory endpoints for the affected display utility names and versions.
  • Confirm whether pdiservice.exe exists on systems running those utilities.
  • Review permissions for pdiservice.exe and related installation directories.
  • Verify upgraded versions match or exceed the fixed releases named in the advisory.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-276: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-3210 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Portrait DisplaySDK2.30Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-276 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Default Permissions

Incorrect Default Permissions represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.