LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-20233: Hirschmann HiLCOS Layer-2 Firewall Multicast Broadcast Traffic Bypass

Hirschmann HiLCOS products OpenBAT, BAT450, WLC, BAT867 contains a firewall filtering vulnerability that fails to correctly filter IPv4 multicast and broadcast traffic when management IP address filtering is disabled, allowing configured filter rules to be bypassed. Attackers with network access can inject or observe multicast and broadcast packets that should have been blocked by the firewall.

MediumCVSS 5.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This issue affects certain Hirschmann HiLCOS network products. Their Layer-2 firewall may fail to block IPv4 multicast and broadcast traffic when management IP address filtering is disabled. A nearby network attacker could see or inject traffic that firewall rules were intended to stop. The business impact is limited but relevant in industrial or segmented networks.

Executive priority

Prioritize this for environments relying on Hirschmann HiLCOS devices to enforce network segmentation. It is not presented as a widespread remote compromise issue, but it can undermine trust boundaries in sensitive operational networks. Address during normal vulnerability remediation unless these devices protect critical or high-trust segments.

Technical view

CVE-2017-20233 is a CWE-284 improper access control issue in Hirschmann HiLCOS OpenBAT, BAT450, WLC, and BAT867. CVSS 3.1 is 5.4, AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N. The bypass concerns IPv4 multicast and broadcast filtering in the Layer-2 firewall under a specific management filtering configuration.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to attackers with adjacent or local network access to affected HiLCOS devices. Internet-wide exposure is not indicated by the provided sources. Organizations using these devices for segmentation, wireless infrastructure, or industrial network isolation should treat this as a configuration-sensitive control failure.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. The attack does not require authentication or user interaction, but does require network adjacency. The likely risk is unauthorized observation or injection of multicast and broadcast packets that administrators expected firewall rules to block.

Researcher notes

Version data in the supplied CVE record is not specific, so affected release boundaries are unclear. The strongest public evidence is the Belden bulletin and VulnCheck advisory. Avoid assuming a patch exists unless confirmed in vendor guidance. The key condition to verify is disabled management IP address filtering.

Mitigation direction

  • Review the Belden security bulletin for vendor-approved remediation or configuration guidance.
  • Inventory Hirschmann HiLCOS OpenBAT, BAT450, WLC, and BAT867 deployments.
  • Identify devices with management IP address filtering disabled.
  • Restrict untrusted access to Layer-2 segments containing affected devices.
  • Monitor vendor channels for firmware or advisory updates.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether listed HiLCOS products are deployed in your environment.
  • Check device configuration for management IP address filtering status.
  • Review Layer-2 firewall rules covering IPv4 multicast and broadcast traffic.
  • Test expected filtering behavior in a controlled maintenance window.
  • Document compensating controls on adjacent network segments.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-284: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-20233 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.4CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N2.82.5VulnCheck
5.3CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

5.3Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2017-20233Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
BeldenHirschmann HiLCOS OpenBAT, BAT450, WLC0, 0, 0unaffected
BeldenHirschmann HiLCOS BAT8670, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-284 · source CWE mapping

Improper Access Control

Improper Access Control represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.