LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-17657: This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Quest N...

This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of NVBUBackup TimeRange method requests. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to construct SQL queries. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the underlying database. Was ZDI-CAN-4294.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2017-17657 is an unauthenticated remote code execution issue in Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12. The risk is business-significant because backup infrastructure often has privileged access and sensitive data. Public sources do not provide CVSS scoring, a named patch, or evidence of active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a priority backup-platform exposure review. The combination of unauthenticated remote access and possible code execution creates meaningful operational risk, even though current sources do not confirm exploitation or provide CVSS scoring.

Technical view

The flaw is a CWE-89 SQL injection in handling NVBUBackup TimeRange method requests. User-supplied input is not properly validated before SQL query construction, allowing a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute code in the context of the underlying database on vulnerable NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12 installations.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12 installations, especially systems reachable by untrusted networks. The source bundle does not identify other affected versions, deployment prerequisites, or specific listening services beyond the vulnerable request handling path.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as CISA KEV in the provided bundle. ZDI describes unauthenticated remote code execution, but the provided sources do not state active exploitation, public exploit availability, or exploitation scale.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strongest for NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12 and the NVBUBackup TimeRange SQL injection path. Do not generalize to other versions without vendor confirmation. The provided sources do not name a patch, workaround, exploit chain, or active exploitation.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Quest guidance for fixed versions or vendor-supported remediation.
  • Upgrade vulnerable NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12 systems if Quest provides an applicable fix.
  • Restrict NetVault Backup access to trusted administration networks only.
  • Remove any unnecessary internet exposure for backup management services.
  • Review database and application privilege boundaries for NetVault components.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all Quest NetVault Backup deployments and record exact versions.
  • Confirm whether any instance runs version 11.3.0.12.
  • Identify systems reachable from untrusted or internet-facing networks.
  • Review logs for unusual NVBUBackup TimeRange activity or SQL errors.
  • Verify remediation status against Quest or ZDI advisory information.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-89: Database access and collection lookup

Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-17657 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
QuestQuest NetVault Backup11.3.0.12Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-89 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.