LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-17655: This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Quest N...

This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of NVBUBackup PluginList method requests. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to construct SQL queries. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the underlying database. Was ZDI-CAN-4289.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2017-17655 affects Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12. A remote attacker who does not need credentials could exploit improper SQL query handling to run code in the database context. Backup systems often hold sensitive operational data, so confirmed exposure should be treated as urgent.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for any reachable NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12 instance. The vulnerability combines unauthenticated remote access with code execution potential on backup infrastructure, but available evidence does not confirm active exploitation.

Technical view

The flaw is CWE-89 SQL injection in handling of NVBUBackup PluginList method requests. The supplied description states user-controlled input is not properly validated before SQL query construction, enabling arbitrary code execution in the underlying database context on vulnerable NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12 installations.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12 based on the supplied sources. Risk is highest where NetVault services are reachable from untrusted networks or broad internal segments. The bundle does not identify additional versions or products.

Exploitation context

The provided sources state remote, unauthenticated exploitation is possible. They do not show CISA KEV listing, active exploitation, public exploit availability, patch version, or observed campaign activity. Treat exploit status as unconfirmed beyond the advisory claim.

Researcher notes

Analysis is constrained to the CVE and ZDI source bundle. The supplied data lacks CVSS, fixed-version detail, exploit telemetry, and full protocol exposure specifics. Avoid assuming other NetVault versions are affected unless vendor guidance confirms it.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Quest NetVault Backup deployments and identify version 11.3.0.12.
  • Check Quest and ZDI guidance for fixed versions or vendor-approved mitigations.
  • Restrict NetVault administrative and service access to trusted backup networks only.
  • Review firewall rules for unintended external or broad internal reachability.
  • Increase monitoring on NetVault and database activity until remediation is confirmed.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed Quest NetVault Backup versions against asset records.
  • Verify whether any NetVault 11.3.0.12 service is network-reachable.
  • Review backup server and database logs for unusual PluginList-related activity.
  • Confirm compensating access controls are enforced on all relevant interfaces.
  • Document remediation status and remaining exposed systems.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-89: Database access and collection lookup

Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-17655 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
QuestQuest NetVault Backup11.3.0.12Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-89 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.