LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-17654: This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Quest N...

This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of NVBUBackup ClientList method requests. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to construct SQL queries. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the underlying database. Was ZDI-CAN-4287.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2017-17654 affects Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12. A remote attacker reportedly does not need authentication and could execute code through a database-query handling flaw. Because backup systems often hold sensitive operational data and recovery capability, confirmed exposure should be treated as urgent even though no CVSS score is provided.

Executive priority

Prioritize this as a backup-platform risk. The vulnerable version enables remote unauthenticated code execution according to the source bundle, but evidence of active exploitation is not provided. Confirm whether the affected version exists, then isolate or remediate quickly.

Technical view

The flaw is CWE-89 SQL injection in handling of NVBUBackup ClientList method requests. A user-supplied string is not properly validated before being used to construct SQL queries, allowing arbitrary code execution in the context of the underlying database, according to the CVE description and ZDI reference.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited by the provided sources to Quest NetVault Backup version 11.3.0.12. Risk is highest where the vulnerable NetVault service is reachable by untrusted networks or where backup infrastructure has broad database or system privileges.

Exploitation context

The source bundle states remote, unauthenticated exploitation is possible. It does not cite known exploitation in the wild, and the CVE is not marked as CISA KEV. Treat exploit activity as unconfirmed from the provided evidence.

Researcher notes

The provided evidence identifies the vulnerable method, weakness class, affected version, and unauthenticated remote impact, but lacks CVSS, fixed-version details, indicators of compromise, and active-exploitation confirmation. Avoid broad product assumptions beyond Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12 installations.
  • Check Quest or ZDI guidance for fixed or supported versions.
  • Prioritize upgrade, retirement, or isolation of confirmed vulnerable instances.
  • Restrict network reachability to trusted administrative and backup networks.
  • Monitor NetVault and database logs for unusual ClientList-related activity.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory NetVault Backup versions across backup servers.
  • Confirm whether version 11.3.0.12 is present.
  • Review network paths to NetVault services from untrusted segments.
  • Check whether compensating access controls restrict remote unauthenticated access.
  • Document remediation status and residual exposure for backup infrastructure.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-89: Database access and collection lookup

Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-17654 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
QuestQuest NetVault Backup11.3.0.12Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-89 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.