LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-17425: This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Quest N...

This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of NVBUSourceDeviceSet Get method requests. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to construct SQL queries. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the underlying database. Was ZDI-CAN-4237.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2017-17425 affects Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12. An unauthenticated remote attacker could abuse SQL query construction in a backup-management request path to execute code in the database context. Backup platforms often hold sensitive operational data, so exposed or unpatched instances should be treated as urgent.

Executive priority

Prioritize within the next remediation cycle, immediately for internet-exposed systems. The issue combines unauthenticated remote access, possible code execution, and a backup platform, which raises business impact even without confirmed active exploitation.

Technical view

The flaw is CWE-89 SQL injection in handling of NVBUSourceDeviceSet Get method requests. The product fails to properly validate a user-supplied string before using it in SQL queries. Sources state this can allow arbitrary code execution in the underlying database context without authentication.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited by the supplied sources to Quest NetVault Backup version 11.3.0.12. Risk is highest where NetVault services are reachable from untrusted networks or broad internal segments.

Exploitation context

The supplied bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation evidence. It does state remote, unauthenticated exploitation is possible. No CVSS vector, public exploit status, or vendor-fixed version is included in the provided evidence.

Researcher notes

Evidence is concise and mostly advisory-level. Avoid assuming affected versions beyond 11.3.0.12. The most useful next work is version confirmation, service exposure mapping, and checking Quest guidance for official remediation details.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Quest NetVault Backup deployments and confirm exact versions.
  • Check Quest and ZDI guidance for fixed builds or vendor-approved remediation.
  • Restrict NetVault service access to trusted administrative networks only.
  • Block direct internet exposure for backup-management services.
  • Monitor database and application logs for suspicious NetVault request activity.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether any instance runs Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12.
  • Review firewall and access-control paths to NetVault services.
  • Check logs for unusual NVBUSourceDeviceSet Get request patterns.
  • Verify whether vendor remediation has been applied and documented.
  • Record any exposed instances as high-priority remediation items.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-89: Database access and collection lookup

Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-17425 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
QuestQuest NetVault Backup11.3.0.12Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-89 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.