LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-17424: This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Quest N...

This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of NVBUScheduleSet Get method requests. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to construct SQL queries. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the underlying database. Was ZDI-CAN-4235.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12 has an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability. The flaw is in request handling that can build unsafe SQL queries from user input. Backup servers are sensitive because they often hold broad system access and recovery data.

Executive priority

Prioritize quickly for any affected backup server. The issue combines unauthenticated remote access with potential database-context code execution, and backup infrastructure is operationally critical. Lack of KEV evidence lowers certainty about active exploitation, not impact.

Technical view

CVE-2017-17424 is a CWE-89 SQL injection in the NVBUScheduleSet Get method handling in Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12. The source states authentication is not required and exploitation can execute code in the underlying database context.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited by the provided sources to Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12. Risk is greatest where NetVault services are reachable from untrusted networks or broadly reachable internal segments.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. ZDI describes the issue as remotely exploitable without authentication, but no exploit-in-the-wild status is provided.

Researcher notes

Do not generalize beyond NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12 from the supplied evidence. The source bundle lacks CVSS scoring and explicit remediation details, so validation should focus on version confirmation, reachability, and vendor advisory review.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify and prioritize Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12 systems.
  • Check Quest or ZDI guidance for the fixed version or supported workaround.
  • Restrict NetVault service access to trusted administrative networks only.
  • Monitor NetVault and database logs for unusual scheduler or SQL activity.
  • Review backup server privileges and reduce unnecessary database access.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory NetVault Backup installations and confirm exact version numbers.
  • Verify whether any NetVault interfaces are reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review configuration for NVBUScheduleSet-related service exposure.
  • Check vendor advisories before concluding remediation is complete.
  • Document compensating network controls where upgrades are delayed.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-89: Database access and collection lookup

Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-17424 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
QuestQuest NetVault Backup11.3.0.12Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-89 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.