LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-17419: This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Quest N...

This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of NVBUTransferHistory Get method requests. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to construct SQL queries. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the underlying database. Was ZDI-CAN-4230.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2017-17419 affects Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12. A remote attacker does not need credentials to abuse SQL query construction in an NVBUTransferHistory Get request, potentially leading to code execution in the database context. Backup systems can hold sensitive data and privileged access, so exposure should be treated seriously.

Executive priority

Prioritize urgently if NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12 exists, especially if reachable beyond a restricted admin network. The risk is high because unauthenticated compromise of backup infrastructure can affect recovery, data confidentiality, and operational resilience.

Technical view

The flaw is CWE-89 SQL injection in handling of NVBUTransferHistory Get method requests. User-supplied input is not properly validated before being used to construct SQL queries. Sources state this can allow arbitrary code execution in the context of the underlying database on vulnerable NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12 installations.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12 installations where the vulnerable request handler is reachable. The bundle does not identify other affected versions, affected ports, deployment defaults, or fixed versions.

Exploitation context

The CVE and ZDI reference describe unauthenticated remote code execution. The source bundle does not provide evidence of active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV.

Researcher notes

Evidence is concise but strong for the affected version and vulnerability class. The bundle does not include CVSS, patch details, proof of active exploitation, or broader version impact. Avoid assuming affected products beyond Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Quest NetVault Backup deployments and identify any 11.3.0.12 systems.
  • Check Quest guidance for fixed versions or vendor-approved mitigations.
  • Restrict NetVault Backup service access to trusted administrative networks.
  • Remove any unnecessary external exposure to backup management services.
  • Monitor database and backup-server activity for suspicious unauthenticated access.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed NetVault Backup versions on all backup servers.
  • Verify whether any host is running version 11.3.0.12.
  • Review firewall rules controlling access to NetVault Backup services.
  • Check logs for unusual NVBUTransferHistory-related requests.
  • Document whether vendor remediation has been applied or is pending.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-89: Database access and collection lookup

Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-17419 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
QuestQuest NetVault Backup11.3.0.12Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-89 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.