LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-17417: This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Quest N...

This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of NVBUPhaseStatus Acknowledge method requests. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to construct SQL queries. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the underlying database. Was ZDI-CAN-4228.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2017-17417 affects Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12. An unauthenticated remote attacker could abuse improper SQL query construction to execute code in the context of the underlying database. Backup infrastructure often has broad access and sensitive data, so exposed or legacy NetVault servers should be treated as urgent.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority legacy backup-system risk. The combination of unauthenticated remote access, code execution impact, and public exploit reference creates meaningful business exposure if vulnerable systems remain reachable.

Technical view

The flaw is a SQL injection issue, CWE-89, in handling NVBUPhaseStatus Acknowledge method requests. User-controlled input is not properly validated before SQL query construction, enabling arbitrary code execution in the database context. The bundle identifies Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12 as affected and cites ZDI-CAN-4228.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12 remains deployed, especially if management or service interfaces are reachable from untrusted networks. The bundle does not identify other affected versions.

Exploitation context

The source bundle cites an Exploit-DB entry and ZDI advisory, indicating public exploit information exists. The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or other evidence of active exploitation, so active exploitation should not be claimed from these sources alone.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strong for the affected product, version, vulnerability class, and unauthenticated remote code execution impact. Evidence is incomplete for CVSS scoring, fixed versions, broader affected ranges, and active exploitation. Avoid expanding scope beyond Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12 without vendor confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12 systems immediately.
  • Check Quest support or vendor guidance for fixed versions or compensating controls.
  • Restrict NetVault Backup service access to trusted administrative networks only.
  • Prioritize upgrade or retirement of vulnerable, unsupported backup servers.
  • Monitor backup and database systems for suspicious NetVault-related activity.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory NetVault Backup deployments and confirm exact product versions.
  • Verify whether any NetVault services are reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review logs for unusual NVBUPhaseStatus Acknowledge activity or SQL errors.
  • Confirm remediation status against Quest or ZDI guidance.
  • Validate segmentation controls around backup and database infrastructure.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-89: Database access and collection lookup

Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-17417 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
QuestQuest NetVault Backup11.3.0.12Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-89 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.