LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-17412: This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Quest N...

This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of GET method requests. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to construct SQL queries. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the underlying database. Was ZDI-CAN-4223.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12 has an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability. A remote attacker could abuse improperly validated GET request input to affect database-backed query handling and execute code in the database context. Backup systems are high-value targets, but the provided sources do not confirm active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as urgent if Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12 is present. The issue combines unauthenticated remote access with code execution against backup infrastructure, which can affect recovery capability and incident resilience.

Technical view

CVE-2017-17412 is a CWE-89 input-validation flaw in Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12 GET method request handling. User-supplied strings are not properly validated before SQL query construction, enabling unauthenticated remote arbitrary code execution in the underlying database context. No CVSS vector is provided in the source bundle.

Likely exposure

Exposure is confirmed only for Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12. Risk is highest where vulnerable NetVault Backup services are reachable from untrusted networks. The sources do not confirm whether other versions are affected.

Exploitation context

Authentication is not required according to the CVE description. The provided bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or other cited evidence of active exploitation, public exploit availability, or exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

The public details are limited to the ZDI/CVE description: GET request handling, insufficient validation before SQL query construction, CWE-89, and execution in database context. No patch version, exploit chain, CVSS score, or active exploitation evidence is included in the bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any Quest NetVault Backup 11.3.0.12 installations.
  • Check Quest guidance for fixed versions or vendor-approved mitigations.
  • Restrict network access to NetVault Backup management services.
  • Prioritize backup infrastructure for patching and access review.
  • Monitor related logs for suspicious unauthenticated GET request activity.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory NetVault Backup versions across servers and appliances.
  • Confirm whether 11.3.0.12 is present in production or recovery environments.
  • Review firewall rules and exposure to untrusted networks.
  • Check vendor advisories before applying upgrades or compensating controls.
  • Validate logs without attempting exploit reproduction.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-89: Database access and collection lookup

Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-17412 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
QuestQuest NetVault Backup11.3.0.12Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-89 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.