LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-16923: Command Injection vulnerability in app_data_center on Shenzhen Tenda Ac9 US_AC9V1.0BR_V15.03.05.14_multi_TD...

Command Injection vulnerability in app_data_center on Shenzhen Tenda Ac9 US_AC9V1.0BR_V15.03.05.14_multi_TD01, Ac9 ac9_kf_V15.03.05.19(6318_)_cn, Ac15 US_AC15V1.0BR_V15.03.05.18_multi_TD01, Ac15 US_AC15V1.0BR_V15.03.05.19_multi_TD01, Ac18 US_AC18V1.0BR_V15.03.05.05_multi_TD01, and Ac18 ac18_kf_V15.03.05.19(6318_)_cn devices allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via a crafted cgi-bin/luci/usbeject?dev_name= GET request from the LAN. This occurs because the "sub_A6E8 usbeject_process_entry" function executes a system function with untrusted input.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE describes an unauthenticated command injection issue in several Shenzhen Tenda AC-series router firmware builds. An attacker on the LAN could make the router run operating-system commands. Business urgency depends on whether these devices are still deployed and reachable from untrusted local networks.

Executive priority

Prioritize if these routers remain in production, especially in branch, small-office, or guest-network environments. The issue can give a LAN attacker router-level command execution, but provided sources do not show internet-wide exposure or confirmed active exploitation.

Technical view

The vulnerable app_data_center usbeject handling path passes untrusted dev_name input into a system function. The CVE lists affected AC9, AC15, and AC18 firmware versions and states exploitation is remote and unauthenticated from the LAN. No CVSS score, vendor fix, or confirmed exploitation is provided in the bundle.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to organizations still running the listed Tenda AC9, AC15, or AC18 firmware builds. Risk increases where guest Wi-Fi, compromised hosts, or untrusted users can reach the router management surface from the LAN.

Exploitation context

The source bundle includes a public proof-of-concept reference, but the CVE is not listed as KEV and no cited source confirms active exploitation. Treat exploit availability as public, while active exploitation remains unconfirmed from the provided evidence.

Researcher notes

Key gaps are missing CVSS data, absent CWE classification, no vendor advisory in the bundle, and no named patch. The description attributes root cause to sub_A6E8 usbeject_process_entry using system with untrusted input.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Tenda AC9, AC15, and AC18 routers and record firmware versions.
  • Check Tenda or reseller guidance for fixed firmware, replacement, or retirement advice.
  • Restrict router management access to trusted administrative networks only.
  • Separate guest and untrusted LAN clients from router management interfaces.
  • Replace devices if supported firmware guidance cannot be confirmed.

Validation and detection

  • Compare deployed firmware against the exact affected versions in the CVE record.
  • Confirm router management surfaces are not reachable from guest or untrusted LAN segments.
  • Review device and network logs for suspicious access to the usbeject handling route.
  • Verify whether vendor firmware or replacement guidance exists for each affected model.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-16923 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.