LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-16674: Datto Windows Agent allows unauthenticated remote command execution via a modified command in conjunction w...

Datto Windows Agent allows unauthenticated remote command execution via a modified command in conjunction with CVE-2017-16673 exploitation, aka an attack with a malformed primary whitelisted command and a secondary non-whitelisted command. This affects Datto Windows Agent (DWA) 1.0.5.0 and earlier. In other words, an attacker could combine this "primary/secondary" attack with the CVE-2017-16673 "rogue pairing" attack to achieve unauthenticated access to all agent machines running these older DWA versions.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Older Datto Windows Agent installations could be taken over without authentication when this issue is combined with CVE-2017-16673. The source describes possible unauthenticated access to all machines running DWA 1.0.5.0 and earlier. No KEV listing or active exploitation evidence was provided.

Executive priority

Treat confirmed legacy DWA exposure as urgent because the impact is remote command execution without authentication when chained with CVE-2017-16673. Business urgency depends on whether these obsolete agents still exist and are reachable.

Technical view

CVE-2017-16674 is a Datto Windows Agent command-whitelisting bypass involving a malformed primary whitelisted command and secondary non-whitelisted command. It depends on CVE-2017-16673 rogue pairing exploitation to reach unauthenticated remote command execution on DWA 1.0.5.0 and earlier.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Datto Windows Agent 1.0.5.0 and earlier, especially where agent systems remain reachable and CVE-2017-16673 rogue pairing exposure is unresolved.

Exploitation context

The provided evidence describes unauthenticated remote command execution only when chained with CVE-2017-16673. The CVE is not listed as KEV, and the bundle does not provide evidence of active exploitation or public exploit availability.

Researcher notes

The record lacks CVSS, CWE, and detailed vendor fix data in the supplied bundle. Analysis should stay tied to affected version discovery, rogue-pairing precondition validation, and Datto guidance rather than assuming a specific patch path.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory all Datto Windows Agent installations and record exact versions.
  • Prioritize DWA 1.0.5.0 and earlier for remediation review.
  • Follow Datto's November 2017 partner security guidance for supported fixes.
  • Remediate CVE-2017-16673 exposure alongside this issue.
  • Restrict network reachability to agent systems while remediation is confirmed.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether any endpoints run DWA 1.0.5.0 or earlier.
  • Verify CVE-2017-16673 is not exploitable on agent systems.
  • Check whether affected agent services are reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review Datto or endpoint logs for unexpected pairing or command activity.
  • Document remediation status for every discovered DWA installation.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-16674 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.