LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-16296: Multiple exploitable buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the PubNub message handler for the "cc" chann...

Multiple exploitable buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the PubNub message handler for the "cc" channel of Insteon Hub running firmware version 1012. Specially crafted commands sent through the PubNub service can cause a stack-based buffer overflow overwriting arbitrary data. An attacker should send an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability. In cmd s_schd, at 0x9d01a1d4, the value for the `days` key is copied using `strcpy` to the buffer at `$sp+0x2b0`.This buffer is 32 bytes large, sending anything longer will cause a buffer overflow.

HighCVSS 8.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2017-16296 is a high-severity flaw in Insteon Hub firmware 1012. An authenticated attacker can send crafted commands through the PubNub service and trigger memory corruption, potentially affecting confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Executive priority

Treat this as high priority where Insteon Hubs are deployed in business, facility, or security-sensitive environments. The main risk is device compromise or disruption, but evidence for active exploitation is absent in the supplied sources.

Technical view

The issue is a stack-based buffer overflow in the PubNub message handler for the Insteon Hub "cc" channel. In cmd s_schd, the days key is copied with strcpy into a 32-byte stack buffer, allowing overflow when longer input is supplied.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to Insteon Hubs running vulnerable firmware, specifically firmware 1012 as described. The broader affected version range is not specified in the supplied CVE data.

Exploitation context

The CVE requires an authenticated HTTP request and has high attack complexity, but no user interaction. The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation evidence.

Researcher notes

Analysis should focus on authenticated command paths reaching the PubNub "cc" handler. The supplied data identifies one vulnerable copy operation involving the days key, but does not provide a confirmed patch level or full affected-version matrix.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Insteon guidance for fixed firmware, retirement, or replacement recommendations.
  • Inventory Insteon Hubs and identify firmware version 1012 or unknown firmware.
  • Restrict hub network access to trusted networks and accounts where operationally possible.
  • Review PubNub-linked automation exposure and remove unused integrations or hubs.
  • Monitor vendor, CVE, and Talos advisories for remediation updates.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether any deployed Insteon Hub reports firmware version 1012.
  • Verify whether PubNub-based control paths are enabled or required.
  • Review access controls for accounts able to send hub commands.
  • Check monitoring for unexpected hub resets, crashes, or automation behavior.
  • Document compensating controls if no vendor fix is available.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-121: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-16296 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.5 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.5CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H1.86Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

8.5High
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2017-16296Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
InsteonHubNot specifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-121 · source CWE mapping

Stack-based Buffer Overflow

Stack-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.