LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-16197: qinserve is a static file server.

qinserve is a static file server. qinserve is vulnerable to a directory traversal issue, giving an attacker access to the filesystem by placing "../" in the url.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

qinserve, a Node.js static file server, can let a remote user request files outside the intended web directory using directory traversal patterns in the URL. If exposed, this could disclose local files the service account can read. The source bundle does not provide a CVSS score or fixed version.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for any exposed qinserve deployment because the issue can turn a simple static file server into a file disclosure path. If qinserve is not present or is not reachable, urgency is lower but inventory evidence should be retained.

Technical view

CVE-2017-16197 is a CWE-22 path traversal flaw in the qinserve npm module. The CVE description says all versions are affected and that ../ in a URL can access the filesystem. Available sources do not define authentication requirements, default exposure, patch status, or precise file read scope.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to environments that install and run qinserve as a static file server, especially if reachable from the internet or internal users. Organizations should verify direct dependencies, transitive dependencies, containers, and deployed Node.js services.

Exploitation context

The source bundle cites a public proof-of-concept repository, but does not cite active exploitation. CISA KEV status is false in the provided data. Treat this as exploitable in principle where qinserve is reachable, while avoiding assumptions about observed attacks.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse: the CVE record identifies path traversal, all versions affected, CWE-22, and references an advisory plus PoC. It does not provide CVSS, patched version, authentication conditions, or platform-specific behavior. Validate findings against deployed code and vendor guidance.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory applications and containers for the qinserve npm module.
  • Remove or replace qinserve where feasible, especially on exposed services.
  • Check vendor or advisory guidance for any fixed package version.
  • Restrict network access to any remaining qinserve deployments.
  • Run services with least-privilege filesystem permissions.

Validation and detection

  • Search package manifests and lockfiles for qinserve usage.
  • Confirm whether any qinserve instance is internet-facing or broadly reachable.
  • Review runtime containers and deployment images for bundled qinserve copies.
  • Verify static file serving roots cannot expose sensitive local files.
  • Document whether compensating access controls are in place.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-22: File access and web shell behavior lookup

File traversal and upload weaknesses can lead teams to review file, web shell, execution, and collection telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

File access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references file access or upload behavior, so file telemetry and web shell review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-16197 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
HackerOneqinserve node moduleAll versionsListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-22 · source CWE mapping

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.