LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-16193: mfrs is a static file server.

mfrs is a static file server. mfrs is vulnerable to a directory traversal issue, giving an attacker access to the filesystem by placing "../" in the url.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysisunknown

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2017-16193 affects the mfrs Node module, a static file server. The reported flaw lets a remote requester traverse outside the intended served directory and read files from the host filesystem. The provided sources do not include CVSS scoring, a fixed version, or evidence of active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted exposure review rather than an emergency unless mfrs is internet-facing or serves sensitive hosts. Prioritize finding and removing the dependency because the provided sources do not identify a patch.

Technical view

The vulnerability is a CWE-22 directory traversal issue in all listed versions of the mfrs node module. The issue arises when URL path input can escape the configured static file root. Impact depends on where mfrs is deployed and what filesystem permissions the process has.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to applications that directly use the mfrs Node module to serve static files, especially if reachable by untrusted users. The bundle lists all versions as affected but does not identify downstream products.

Exploitation context

The source bundle references a public proof-of-concept repository and an old Node Security advisory. It does not show CISA KEV listing, confirmed in-the-wild exploitation, exploitation scale, or current package maintenance status.

Researcher notes

Key gaps are missing CVSS data, no confirmed fix, and limited affected-product detail beyond all versions of the mfrs node module. Validate only in authorized environments and focus on dependency presence, route exposure, and filesystem read boundaries.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify whether mfrs is present in application dependencies or deployed services.
  • Do not expose mfrs-backed static serving to untrusted traffic until reviewed.
  • Check vendor or package guidance; no fixed version is named in the provided sources.
  • Replace or remove mfrs if no maintained safe release is available.
  • Limit filesystem permissions for any process serving static content.

Validation and detection

  • Review dependency manifests and lockfiles for the mfrs Node module.
  • Map any public routes or services using mfrs for static file delivery.
  • Confirm the service cannot read outside its intended static directory.
  • Check logs for suspicious path traversal attempts without replaying exploit patterns.
  • Verify runtime filesystem permissions restrict access to sensitive files.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-22: File access and web shell behavior lookup

File traversal and upload weaknesses can lead teams to review file, web shell, execution, and collection telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

File access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references file access or upload behavior, so file telemetry and web shell review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-16193 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
HackerOnemfrs node moduleAll versionsListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-22 · source CWE mapping

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.