LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-16129: The HTTP client module superagent is vulnerable to ZIP bomb attacks.

The HTTP client module superagent is vulnerable to ZIP bomb attacks. In a ZIP bomb attack, the HTTP server replies with a compressed response that becomes several magnitudes larger once uncompressed. If a client does not take special care when processing such responses, it may result in excessive CPU and/or memory consumption. An attacker might exploit such a weakness for a DoS attack. To exploit this the attacker must control the location (URL) that superagent makes a request to.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Superagent, a Node.js HTTP client, could be overwhelmed by a compressed server response that expands massively when decompressed. This can exhaust CPU or memory and disrupt the application. The attacker must influence the URL the application requests, so business urgency depends on whether user-supplied or partner-controlled URLs reach superagent.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate remediation item for internet-facing or integration-heavy Node services. Prioritize quickly if the application fetches user-supplied URLs, processes webhooks, or contacts partner endpoints that are not fully trusted.

Technical view

CVE-2017-16129 affects the superagent node module before 3.7.0. The issue is CWE-409: improper handling of highly compressed data. A malicious or controlled HTTP endpoint can return a response that expands dramatically during decompression, causing excessive CPU or memory consumption and potential denial of service.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in Node.js applications using superagent versions below 3.7.0, especially where users, integrations, webhooks, or configuration can control requested URLs. Systems using only trusted fixed endpoints have lower practical exposure.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation evidence. Exploitation requires attacker control over the requested URL or an endpoint that superagent contacts, then causing resource exhaustion through compressed response handling.

Researcher notes

Key constraints are version and reachability. The public record names affected versions as below 3.7.0 and requires control of the requested URL. No CVSS score is provided in the bundle, so severity should be validated against application architecture.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory direct and transitive superagent dependencies.
  • Remove or upgrade superagent versions below 3.7.0.
  • Review vendor guidance for current supported remediation.
  • Restrict user-controlled URLs reaching server-side HTTP clients.
  • Apply request size, timeout, and memory safeguards where supported.

Validation and detection

  • Check package manifests and lockfiles for superagent below 3.7.0.
  • Identify code paths where external input controls requested URLs.
  • Review whether compressed responses are automatically decompressed.
  • Confirm production services enforce timeout and resource limits.
  • Use safe internal tests to verify large responses cannot exhaust resources.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-409: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-16129 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
HackerOnesuperagent node module<3.7.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-409 · source CWE mapping

Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification)

Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.