LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-16040: gfe-sass is a library for promises (CommonJS/Promises/A,B,D) gfe-sass downloads resources over HTTP, which...

gfe-sass is a library for promises (CommonJS/Promises/A,B,D) gfe-sass downloads resources over HTTP, which leaves it vulnerable to MITM attacks. It may be possible to cause remote code execution (RCE) by swapping out the requested resources with an attacker controlled copy if the attacker is on the network or positioned in between the user and the remote server.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2017-16040 affects the gfe-sass Node module. It downloads resources over HTTP, so someone positioned on the network path could tamper with those downloads. The source says this may allow remote code execution, but provides no CVSS score, fixed version, or evidence of active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted dependency hygiene issue, not an internet-wide emergency. Prioritize confirmation in active codebases and build systems because the possible impact is serious, but exploitation requires network positioning and no active exploitation evidence is provided.

Technical view

The issue is classified as CWE-311: missing encryption for sensitive data. All versions of the HackerOne gfe-sass node module are listed affected. The risk comes from HTTP resource retrieval, enabling a man-in-the-middle to substitute attacker-controlled resources. The bundle does not identify a patch or maintainer mitigation.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to environments that include gfe-sass in application dependencies or build tooling. Because the source lists all versions as affected, version filtering alone is insufficient. Confirm whether the package is present and whether its HTTP downloads occur in trusted or untrusted network paths.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show KEV listing, active exploitation, or public exploit evidence. Exploitation depends on an attacker being on-path between the user and remote server. The stated impact is possible RCE through resource substitution, but practical exploitability is not further detailed.

Researcher notes

Key gaps are absent CVSS data, no fixed version, and no exploitation telemetry in the provided sources. Research should focus on dependency reachability, whether HTTP resource retrieval still occurs, and whether the package is still used in any production or CI/CD path.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory projects and build pipelines for the gfe-sass Node module.
  • Check vendor or package maintainer guidance for any replacement, deprecation, or fixed release.
  • If present, evaluate removing or replacing gfe-sass with a maintained alternative.
  • Restrict dependency installation and build activity to trusted networks where feasible.
  • Monitor dependency advisories for updated remediation guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Search dependency manifests and lockfiles for gfe-sass.
  • Review software composition analysis results for CVE-2017-16040.
  • Confirm whether any build or runtime workflow invokes gfe-sass.
  • Document affected repositories, environments, and ownership for remediation tracking.
  • Record that sources do not provide a fixed version.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-311: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-16040 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
HackerOnegfe-sass node moduleAll versionsListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-311 · source CWE mapping

Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data

Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.