LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-16035: The hubl-server module is a wrapper for the HubL Development Server.

The hubl-server module is a wrapper for the HubL Development Server. During installation hubl-server downloads a set of dependencies from api.hubapi.com. It appears in the code that these files are downloaded over HTTPS however the api.hubapi.com endpoint redirects to a HTTP url. Because of this behavior an attacker with the ability to man-in-the-middle a developer or system performing a package installation could compromise the integrity of the installation.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2017-16035 affects the hubl-server Node.js module. During installation, dependency downloads appear to start over HTTPS but are redirected to HTTP. A person controlling the network path could tamper with installation content. This is mainly a software supply-chain risk for developer workstations and build systems that install the package.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate supply-chain exposure. It is not presented as actively exploited, but it can undermine developer or CI installation integrity. Prioritize inventory first, then decide whether the package is still needed or should be replaced.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-311: missing encryption for sensitive data in transit. The module downloads dependencies from api.hubapi.com during install, and the endpoint redirects to HTTP, weakening transport integrity. A man-in-the-middle could alter downloaded files during package installation. Sources list all versions as affected, but do not provide CVSS, patch, or fixed-version details.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to environments that install the hubl-server Node module, especially developer machines, CI runners, or build images. Runtime systems not installing this package are less directly exposed based on the supplied evidence.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV. Exploitation would require network-path control during package installation. No public exploit status or weaponized activity is provided in the supplied sources.

Researcher notes

Evidence is narrow but clear: install-time dependency retrieval redirects from HTTPS to HTTP, creating a man-in-the-middle integrity risk. The bundle lacks CVSS, affected version ranges beyond all versions, exploit telemetry, and patch details. Avoid asserting a fix without updated vendor confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory projects, lockfiles, and CI images for hubl-server usage.
  • Check current vendor or package-maintainer guidance for fixed versions or replacement advice.
  • Avoid fresh installations from untrusted networks while assessing exposure.
  • Use trusted, controlled build environments for any required package installation.
  • Remove or replace hubl-server if business use is no longer required.

Validation and detection

  • Search dependency manifests and lockfiles for hubl-server.
  • Review CI and developer setup scripts for hubl-server installation steps.
  • Confirm whether affected installations still occur in active build workflows.
  • Check whether any vendor advisory names a patched or replacement version.
  • Document exposed repositories, systems, and owners for remediation tracking.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-311: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-16035 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
HackerOnehubl-server node moduleAll versionsListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-311 · source CWE mapping

Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data

Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.