LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-15873: The get_next_block function in archival/libarchive/decompress_bunzip2.c in BusyBox 1.27.2 has an Integer Ov...

The get_next_block function in archival/libarchive/decompress_bunzip2.c in BusyBox 1.27.2 has an Integer Overflow that may lead to a write access violation.

MediumCVSS 5.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2017-15873 is an integer overflow in BusyBox’s bunzip2 decompression code. If an affected system processes a specially crafted bzip2 input, BusyBox may crash or hit a write access violation. The documented impact is availability, not data theft or privilege escalation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a patch-management item, not an emergency incident, unless BusyBox decompression is exposed to untrusted files in automated workflows. Prioritize embedded and appliance environments where BusyBox may be bundled and overlooked.

Technical view

The flaw is in get_next_block within archival/libarchive/decompress_bunzip2.c in BusyBox 1.27.2. The CVE maps to CWE-190 and has CVSS 3.1 score 5.5, AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H. Sources point to an upstream BusyBox commit and Debian/Ubuntu security updates.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on Linux systems, appliances, containers, or firmware images that include vulnerable BusyBox bunzip2 functionality. The source bundle specifically names BusyBox 1.27.2 and Debian/Ubuntu security updates, but the affected product metadata is incomplete.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited active exploitation. The CVSS vector indicates local access and user interaction are required. Practical risk depends on whether affected BusyBox decompression handles untrusted bzip2 content in scripts, services, update paths, or user workflows.

Researcher notes

The source evidence supports an availability-impact integer overflow in BusyBox bunzip2. Affected metadata is sparse, so version scoping should come from vendor advisories, package changelogs, and the upstream commit rather than CPE data alone.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply BusyBox updates from the relevant OS or firmware vendor.
  • Review Debian and Ubuntu advisories if those distributions are in scope.
  • Check the upstream BusyBox commit for fixed-code lineage.
  • Avoid processing untrusted bzip2 content with affected BusyBox builds.
  • For appliances, request patched firmware or vendor confirmation.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory BusyBox versions across hosts, containers, images, and firmware.
  • Confirm package versions include the vendor security update.
  • Check whether workflows call BusyBox bunzip2 on untrusted files.
  • Use SBOMs or firmware manifests to find bundled BusyBox copies.
  • Document systems where vendor fix status is unknown.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-190: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-15873 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
6Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H1.83.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2017-15873Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-190 · source CWE mapping

Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Integer Overflow or Wraparound represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.