LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-14454: Multiple exploitable buffer overflow vulnerabilities exists in the PubNub message handler for the "control"...

Multiple exploitable buffer overflow vulnerabilities exists in the PubNub message handler for the "control" channel of Insteon Hub running firmware version 1012. Specially crafted replies received from the PubNub service can cause buffer overflows on a global section overwriting arbitrary data. An attacker should impersonate PubNub and answer an HTTPS GET request to trigger this vulnerability. The `strcpy` at [18] overflows the buffer `insteon_pubnub.channel_al`, which has a size of 16 bytes.

HighCVSS 8.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2017-14454 is a buffer overflow in the Insteon Hub PubNub control-channel handler. A malicious response from an impersonated PubNub service can corrupt memory, creating potential confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Treat exposed or unmanaged hubs as high-risk IoT assets.

Executive priority

Prioritize discovery and containment over emergency disruption. This is high-impact memory corruption, but public evidence in the bundle does not confirm active exploitation or a named fix. Legacy hubs should be isolated or retired if vendor support is unavailable.

Technical view

Insteon Hub firmware 1012 copies a control-channel value into a 16-byte global buffer using strcpy, allowing overflow of insteon_pubnub.channel_al. The source says exploitation requires impersonating PubNub and answering the hub’s HTTPS GET request. CVSS 3.0 is 8.5 high, with high attack complexity.

Likely exposure

Most relevant exposure is legacy Insteon Hub deployments running firmware 1012 and relying on PubNub-based remote control. Risk is lower where hubs are retired, isolated, or tightly egress-controlled. The bundle does not identify other affected versions.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation evidence. Exploitation is not described as trivial: the attacker must impersonate PubNub and deliver a crafted HTTPS response to the hub.

Researcher notes

Evidence is based on the CVE record and Talos report summary. The key weakness is CWE-120, fixed-size buffer overflow in the PubNub control handler. The bundle names firmware 1012 but does not provide a patch level, broader version range, or exploit telemetry.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Insteon or vendor guidance for fixed firmware, replacement, or retirement advice.
  • Inventory and retire unsupported Insteon Hub firmware 1012 where feasible.
  • Segment hubs on an IoT network away from business-critical systems.
  • Restrict hub outbound access to required destinations using documented vendor requirements.
  • Monitor DNS, proxy, and TLS paths for unexpected PubNub redirection or interception.

Validation and detection

  • Identify Insteon Hub assets and record firmware versions, especially firmware 1012.
  • Confirm whether PubNub remote-control functionality is enabled or required.
  • Review egress rules for hub network segments and document allowed destinations.
  • Check logs for unusual PubNub connection failures, redirects, or interception indicators.
  • Avoid production validation that impersonates PubNub or sends crafted responses.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-120: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-14454 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.5 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.5CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H1.86Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

8.5High
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2017-14454Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
InsteonHubNot specifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-120 · source CWE mapping

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.