LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-14114: RTPproxy through 2.2.alpha.20160822 has a NAT feature that results in not properly determining the IP addre...

RTPproxy through 2.2.alpha.20160822 has a NAT feature that results in not properly determining the IP address and port number of the legitimate recipient of RTP traffic, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information or cause a denial of service (communication outage) via crafted RTP packets.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Discuss exposureBack to CVEs
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysisunknown

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE describes a flaw in RTPproxy NAT handling that can misdirect real-time voice media traffic. A remote attacker sending crafted RTP packets may receive sensitive media or cause a communication outage. The source bundle does not provide a CVSS score, vendor advisory, or confirmed active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted infrastructure review item for VoIP and media services. Urgency depends on whether affected RTPproxy versions are internet-reachable or exposed to untrusted RTP traffic. Business impact can include call disruption and possible media disclosure, but severity and exploitation evidence are incomplete.

Technical view

RTPproxy through 2.2.alpha.20160822 may improperly determine the legitimate recipient IP address and port for RTP traffic when NAT behavior is involved. The stated impacts are sensitive information exposure and denial of service via crafted RTP packets. No CWE, CVSS vector, patch detail, or affected CPE is provided.

Likely exposure

Organizations are potentially exposed if they operate RTPproxy through 2.2.alpha.20160822 in VoIP, SIP, RTP relay, or NAT traversal paths. The bundle does not establish exposure for other media proxies, later RTPproxy versions, hosted VoIP services, or downstream vendor appliances.

Exploitation context

The CVE says remote attackers can trigger the issue with crafted RTP packets. CISA KEV is false in the bundle, and no cited source confirms active exploitation. The public reference to rtpbleed.com suggests public discussion, but the provided data does not include exploit prevalence or telemetry.

Researcher notes

The source record is sparse: no CVSS, CWE, CPE, patch statement, or vendor advisory is included. Analysis should stay constrained to RTPproxy through 2.2.alpha.20160822 and the stated NAT recipient-selection flaw. Avoid extrapolating to unrelated RTP stacks without separate evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory RTPproxy deployments and identify any through 2.2.alpha.20160822.
  • Check RTPproxy project or vendor guidance for fixed versions or configuration mitigations.
  • Reduce untrusted network exposure to RTPproxy-mediated RTP paths where architecture permits.
  • Prioritize monitoring for abnormal RTP flows and unexpected call media outages.
  • Document any accepted risk if replacement or upgrade is not immediately possible.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether RTPproxy is deployed in production voice or media relay paths.
  • Record RTPproxy versions and compare them to through 2.2.alpha.20160822.
  • Review network ACLs and firewall rules around RTP ingress and egress.
  • Check logs and call-quality monitoring for unexplained media redirection or outages.
  • Verify remediation status against vendor or project guidance, not assumptions.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Public sources used

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-14114 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.