LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-12234: Multiple vulnerabilities in the implementation of the Common Industrial Protocol (CIP) feature in Cisco IOS...

Multiple vulnerabilities in the implementation of the Common Industrial Protocol (CIP) feature in Cisco IOS 12.4 through 15.6 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause an affected device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerabilities are due to the improper parsing of crafted CIP packets destined to an affected device. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted CIP packets to be processed by an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvc43709.

HighCVSS 7.5Known exploitedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A network attacker can crash certain Cisco IOS devices that process crafted Common Industrial Protocol packets. The business impact is outage risk: affected routers or switches may reload, disrupting industrial or operational networks that depend on them.

Executive priority

Treat as high priority for operational networks. This is not a data theft issue; it is a reliability and availability risk with confirmed exploitation history.

Technical view

Cisco IOS 12.4 through 15.6 contains improper parsing in the CIP feature. Crafted CIP packets destined to an affected device can cause reload and denial of service. The issue is unauthenticated, remote, low complexity, availability-only, tracked as CWE-20 and Cisco bug CSCvc43709.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Cisco IOS devices run affected 12.4 through 15.6 releases and have the CIP feature reachable from untrusted or broad internal networks.

Exploitation context

CISA lists CVE-2017-12234 in the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, so exploitation is publicly confirmed. The provided sources do not include exploit mechanics or evidence of current campaign targeting.

Researcher notes

Do not assume all Cisco IOS devices are affected. Validate IOS release, CIP feature exposure, and control-plane reachability. The bundle names CSCvc43709 but does not provide exploit details or exact fixed versions.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify Cisco IOS devices running versions 12.4 through 15.6.
  • Determine whether the CIP feature is enabled and reachable.
  • Review Cisco advisory guidance for fixed software or supported workarounds.
  • Restrict CIP reachability to trusted industrial management paths.
  • Prioritize remediation for internet-facing or broadly reachable devices.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory IOS versions on routers and switches supporting CIP.
  • Confirm whether CIP traffic can reach the device control plane.
  • Check for unexpected reloads around CIP-related traffic events.
  • Verify remediation against Cisco advisory cisco-sa-20170927-cip.
  • Document remaining exposure and compensating network controls.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-12234 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
Yes
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CISA KEV status

Status
Known exploited
Source
CISA / ADP
Date added
Not provided

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2017-12234Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/aCisco IOSCisco IOSListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.