LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2017-10772: XnView Classic for Windows Version 2.40 might allow attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have...

XnView Classic for Windows Version 2.40 might allow attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted .rle file, related to "Data from Faulting Address controls Branch Selection starting at ntdll_77df0000!memcmp+0x0000000000000018" (with RPC initialization).

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysisunknown

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE concerns XnView Classic for Windows 2.40 processing a crafted .rle image file. The public record says it may cause a denial of service and possibly other unspecified impact. The available bundle does not provide a CVSS score, confirmed patch, or evidence of active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted hygiene issue unless XnView Classic 2.40 is widely deployed or used to handle external image files. Prioritize inventory and restriction first, because public evidence does not establish active exploitation or a confirmed fix.

Technical view

The issue is tied to crafted RLE file handling in XnView Classic 2.40, with the CVE description referencing attacker-controlled data influencing branch selection at ntdll memcmp during RPC initialization. Public details are sparse and do not define the memory-safety root cause or reliable impact beyond denial of service.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on Windows endpoints that still have XnView Classic 2.40 installed and can open untrusted .rle files. The source bundle does not provide CPEs, affected version ranges beyond 2.40, or deployment prevalence.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as KEV in the provided bundle, and no cited source confirms active exploitation. The described attack path appears to require a crafted .rle file being opened or processed by the affected application.

Researcher notes

The public record is thin: no CVSS, CWE, CPE, patch status, or detailed root-cause analysis is included. Avoid assuming code execution. Focus research on confirming affected binaries, crash conditions, vendor advisories, and whether later XnView Classic releases address the RLE handling flaw.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Windows systems for XnView Classic 2.40 installations.
  • Check XnView/vendor guidance for a supported fixed version or advisory.
  • Restrict opening untrusted .rle files with XnView Classic 2.40.
  • Remove or restrict the application where it is not business-required.
  • Use endpoint controls to limit risky file associations if vendor guidance is unavailable.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed XnView Classic versions on managed Windows endpoints.
  • Identify whether .rle files are associated with XnView Classic.
  • Review endpoint crash telemetry for XnView failures involving RLE files.
  • Check mail and web controls for recent .rle file delivery to users.
  • Record whether vendor documentation identifies a patch or workaround.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2017-10772 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.