Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
Kubernetes 1.6.0 through 1.6.5 could create Azure-backed Persistent Volumes with overly open default permissions. The storage URI was reachable without authentication from the public internet if someone obtained it. Getting that URI reportedly required privileged cluster access or authenticated Azure portal access, reducing broad opportunistic exposure.
Executive priority
Prioritize this for legacy Azure Kubernetes environments or historical incident review. Current exposure is unlikely unless old clusters, migrated storage, or unchanged Azure containers remain accessible.
Technical view
The Kubernetes Azure cloud provider set Persistent Volume permissions to "container" by default in affected 1.6.x releases. That exposed a publicly accessible URI for the backing Azure storage container. The source bundle does not provide CVSS, CWE, a named patch, or confirmed exploitation evidence.
Likely exposure
Likely limited to organizations that ran Kubernetes 1.6.0 through 1.6.5 with the Azure cloud provider and created Persistent Volumes during that period.
Exploitation context
No KEV listing or provided source states active exploitation. Abuse depends on obtaining the exposed URI, which the CVE description says requires privileged Kubernetes access or authenticated Azure portal access.
Researcher notes
Evidence is sparse in the provided bundle: no CVSS, CWE, exploit confirmation, or explicit fix details are included. The key security issue is public unauthenticated reachability of Azure PV storage when the URI is known.
Mitigation direction
- Review Kubernetes advisory and issue for vendor-confirmed remediation guidance.
- Inventory Azure-backed PVs created by Kubernetes 1.6.0 through 1.6.5.
- Check affected Azure storage containers for public container-level access.
- Restrict exposed containers according to vendor and cloud-provider guidance.
- Treat exposed storage contents as potentially disclosed if public access existed.
Validation and detection
- Confirm whether any clusters used Kubernetes 1.6.0 through 1.6.5 on Azure.
- Identify Persistent Volumes provisioned by the Kubernetes Azure cloud provider.
- Review Azure storage access settings for container-level public exposure.
- Check whether exposed URIs appeared in logs, tickets, documentation, or portals.
- Document affected data types and retention period for risk assessment.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
Container behavior lookup
The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2017-1002100 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Unknown
- CVSS
- Not scored
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS and timeline data
No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://groups.google.com/d/msg/kubernetes-security-announce/n3VBg_WJZic/-ddIqKXqAAAJCVE reference · x_refsource_MISC
- https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/47611CVE reference · x_refsource_MISC
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
