Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
Mautic 2.6.1 and earlier reportedly did not set security flags on session cookies. That can make user sessions less resistant to theft or misuse if other conditions are present, such as insecure transport or browser-side script exposure. The source bundle does not provide CVSS, CWE, exploit evidence, or a named fixed version.
Executive priority
Treat this as a targeted hygiene issue for legacy Mautic deployments. It should not outrank actively exploited vulnerabilities, but internet-facing affected systems should be remediated promptly because session weaknesses can amplify other attacks.
Technical view
The CVE describes missing session-cookie flags in Mautic 2.6.1 and earlier. The exact omitted flags are not stated in the provided CVE summary. This is a session-management hardening issue, not evidence of standalone remote code execution. No CISA KEV listing or active exploitation evidence is provided.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most relevant to organizations running Mautic 2.6.1 or earlier, especially internet-facing marketing automation portals or administrative interfaces. The provided affected-product metadata is incomplete, so version inventory is required.
Exploitation context
The bundle provides no evidence of active exploitation. Missing cookie flags can increase session compromise risk when combined with other weaknesses, but the sources do not document exploit prerequisites, exploit maturity, or observed attacks.
Researcher notes
Evidence is sparse: no CVSS, CWE, exploit status, or fix version is present in the provided bundle. Analysis should stay limited to Mautic 2.6.1 and earlier unless additional vendor or advisory text confirms broader scope.
Mitigation direction
- Inventory all Mautic instances and identify versions at or below 2.6.1.
- Check Mautic or advisory guidance for the fixed version or supported configuration.
- Prioritize remediation for internet-facing or administrator-accessible deployments.
- Use HTTPS consistently and validate session-cookie hardening after any vendor-approved change.
- Restrict administrative access while remediation guidance is confirmed.
Validation and detection
- Confirm the running Mautic version for each deployment.
- Review HTTP Set-Cookie headers for Mautic session cookies in a safe test flow.
- Verify cookie attributes match current vendor guidance and organizational policy.
- Check whether public access exists to affected Mautic interfaces.
- Document compensating controls if immediate upgrade is not possible.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CVE-2017-1000046 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Unknown
- CVSS
- Not scored
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS and timeline data
No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://www.trustmatta.com/advisories/MATTA-2017-002.txtCVE reference · x_refsource_MISC
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.