LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2016-6329: OpenVPN, when using a 64-bit block cipher, makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data vi...

OpenVPN, when using a 64-bit block cipher, makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data via a birthday attack against a long-duration encrypted session, as demonstrated by an HTTP-over-OpenVPN session using Blowfish in CBC mode, aka a "Sweet32" attack.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE is about weak encryption choices in OpenVPN. If OpenVPN uses a 64-bit block cipher, especially Blowfish in CBC mode, very long encrypted sessions can leak some cleartext through the Sweet32 birthday attack. The public bundle does not show active exploitation or a complete affected-version list.

Executive priority

Treat this as a cryptographic hygiene issue with moderate urgency. It is not flagged as actively exploited in the bundle, but VPNs protect sensitive traffic and legacy cipher choices can create avoidable confidentiality risk over time.

Technical view

OpenVPN sessions using 64-bit block ciphers are susceptible to birthday-bound collision risks over long-duration encrypted traffic. The CVE description cites HTTP-over-OpenVPN with Blowfish CBC as a demonstrated case. The issue is configuration and cipher-suite dependent, not a blanket statement that all OpenVPN deployments are exposed.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where OpenVPN permits or negotiates 64-bit block ciphers and carries long-lived, repetitive traffic. Environments using modern non-64-bit ciphers are less likely exposed. The source bundle lists vendor references but does not provide a complete affected product or version matrix.

Exploitation context

The bundle marks KEV as false and provides no cited evidence of active exploitation. The attack requires conditions favorable to Sweet32-style collision attacks, including a vulnerable cipher choice and long-running encrypted sessions with enough traffic to create meaningful collision risk.

Researcher notes

Do not assume all OpenVPN instances are affected. Confirm negotiated cipher behavior, session duration, and traffic volume. The strongest evidence in the bundle is the CVE description, Sweet32 reference, and OpenVPN SWEET32 page; product-specific impact requires the linked vendor advisories.

Mitigation direction

  • Review OpenVPN and vendor guidance for SWEET32-related cipher recommendations.
  • Disable 64-bit block ciphers where supported by policy and compatibility requirements.
  • Prefer vendor-supported modern cipher configurations for VPN profiles.
  • Reduce long-lived sessions using vulnerable cipher choices until remediated.
  • Check HPE, IBM, Gentoo, Siemens, and OpenVPN advisories where relevant.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory OpenVPN deployments and managed products that embed OpenVPN.
  • Review configured and negotiated VPN ciphers for 64-bit block ciphers.
  • Look specifically for Blowfish CBC use in OpenVPN profiles.
  • Identify long-duration VPN sessions carrying repetitive or sensitive application traffic.
  • Confirm remediation against vendor guidance, not only local configuration intent.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2016-6329 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
6Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.