Security readout for executives and security teams
CVE-2016-3718 is an ImageMagick SSRF issue. If a vulnerable system processes a crafted image, ImageMagick’s HTTP or FTP handling could make the server contact attacker-chosen locations. This matters most where image uploads or automated conversions run inside trusted networks. Likely exposed systems include applications, appliances, or services that use vulnerable ImageMagick versions to process user-supplied or external images. The bundle does not identify exact downstream product versions beyond ImageMagick and listed vendor advisories. Treat this as urgent for internet-facing upload or media-processing services. KEV listing raises priority above the CVSS medium score, because exploitation has been observed and affected workflows often sit near internal services. Mitigation focus: Upgrade ImageMagick to 6.9.3-10, 7.0.1-1, or later.; Apply relevant OS vendor security updates for ImageMagick packages.; Review vendor advisories for distro-specific backported fixes..
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup
Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCloud metadata behavior lookup
The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2016-3718 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Medium
- CVSS
- 5.5 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- Yes
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CISA KEV status
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N1.83.6Primary CVE scoreVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
5.5MediumVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=29588CVE reference · x_refsource_CONFIRM
- 39767CVE reference · exploit, x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB
- [debian-lts-announce] 20180627 [SECURITY] [DLA 1401-1] graphicsmagick security updateCVE reference · mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
- GLSA-201611-21CVE reference · vendor-advisory, x_refsource_GENTOO
- https://www.imagemagick.org/script/changelog.phpCVE reference · x_refsource_CONFIRM
- https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2016-3718CVE reference · government-resource
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.