CVE-2016-2183: The DES and Triple DES ciphers, as used in the TLS, SSH, and IPSec protocols and other protocols and produc...
The DES and Triple DES ciphers, as used in the TLS, SSH, and IPSec protocols and other protocols and products, have a birthday bound of approximately four billion blocks, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data via a birthday attack against a long-duration encrypted session, as demonstrated by an HTTPS session using Triple DES in CBC mode, aka a "Sweet32" attack.
Security readout for executives and security teams
CVE-2016-2183 is the Sweet32 weakness in DES and Triple DES. If a service still permits these old ciphers, a remote attacker may recover cleartext from long-running encrypted sessions. The main business concern is confidential data exposure, especially on legacy systems or services with outdated cryptographic policy. Exposure is likely where internet-facing or internal services still negotiate DES or Triple DES for TLS, SSH, IPsec, or product-specific encrypted channels. The source bundle does not identify a single affected product list; it points to multiple vendor advisories and uses broad protocol language. Treat this as a high-priority legacy cryptography cleanup. It is not a typical remote code execution issue, but it can undermine confidentiality on systems that still permit DES or Triple DES, especially where sensitive traffic or long sessions are present. Mitigation focus: Inventory TLS, SSH, IPsec, and appliance configurations for DES or Triple DES support.; Apply product-specific vendor updates and configuration guidance from relevant advisories.; Disable DES and Triple DES where vendor guidance and compatibility requirements allow..
Prepared
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-200: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup
Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-200 · source CWE mapping
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.