LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2016-20051: Snews CMS 1.7 Cross-Site Request Forgery via changeup

Snews CMS 1.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to change administrator credentials without authentication by crafting malicious HTML forms. Attackers can trick authenticated administrators into visiting a page containing a hidden form that submits POST requests to the changeup action, modifying the admin username and password parameters to gain unauthorized access.

MediumCVSS 6.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Snews CMS 1.7 has a cross-site request forgery issue that can let an attacker change administrator credentials if an administrator is induced into submitting a malicious web request. This could lead to loss of control of the site. The sources include a public exploit reference, but do not show confirmed active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as a targeted site-takeover risk for legacy Snews CMS deployments. It is not currently supported by evidence of active exploitation, but a public exploit reference increases urgency to identify affected systems and either obtain vendor guidance or retire the software.

Technical view

CVE-2016-20051 is a CWE-352 CSRF vulnerability in Snews CMS 1.7 involving the administrator credential-change flow, referenced as the changeup action. The provided description says crafted HTML forms can modify administrator username and password values. CVSS v4 is 6.9. Public references include Exploit-DB and VulnCheck.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to organizations still running Snews CMS 1.7. Risk is most relevant where administrators access the CMS through a browser and can be lured to attacker-controlled content while administrative access remains active.

Exploitation context

A public exploit reference exists, but the bundle does not cite KEV listing or confirmed in-the-wild exploitation. The vulnerability is CSRF-based, so practical exploitation depends on administrator browsing behavior and session state. Source details are limited and should be validated in the target environment.

Researcher notes

The bundle describes CSRF requiring a malicious form and administrator involvement, while the CVSS vector lists UI:N. Treat interaction requirements as an evidence ambiguity. Avoid assuming broader Snews versions or patches not named in the sources.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any Snews CMS 1.7 deployments in production or exposed environments.
  • Check Snews CMS maintainer or vendor guidance for fixes or supported upgrade paths.
  • If no supported fix exists, plan migration away from affected deployments.
  • Limit administrative access to trusted networks where operationally feasible.
  • Educate administrators not to browse untrusted sites while logged into the CMS.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether any deployed CMS instance is Snews CMS version 1.7.
  • Review administrative credential change history for unexpected changes.
  • Verify whether credential-change requests have CSRF protections in the deployed code.
  • Check web logs for unusual administrator credential-change activity.
  • Confirm whether administrative interfaces are externally reachable.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2016-20051 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.9 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.9CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:LPrimary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

6.9Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2016-20051Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
SnewscmsSnews CMS Cross Site Request Forgery1.7Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.