LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2016-15035: Doc2k RE-Chat re_chat.js cross site scripting

A vulnerability was found in Doc2k RE-Chat 1.0. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part of the file js_on_radio-emergency.de_/re_chat.js. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The patch is named bd17d497ddd3bab4ef9c6831c747c37cc016c570. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-238155.

MediumCVSS 4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Doc2k RE-Chat 1.0 has a cross-site scripting issue in re_chat.js. A remote authenticated attacker could potentially make malicious script run in a user’s browser, affecting integrity rather than confidentiality or availability. Public sources name a patch commit, but provide limited implementation detail.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate web-application risk. It is not supported as actively exploited, but browser-script injection can damage trust, sessions, and user workflows. Patch or retire affected deployments during normal vulnerability remediation cycles.

Technical view

CVE-2016-15035 is CWE-79 cross-site scripting affecting an unknown part of js_on_radio-emergency.de_/re_chat.js in Doc2k RE-Chat 1.0. CVSS v2 is 4.0 with network access, low complexity, and authentication required. VulDB associates it with VDB-238155 and references commit bd17d497ddd3bab4ef9c6831c747c37cc016c570 as the fix.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to organizations running Doc2k RE-Chat 1.0, especially internet-accessible or externally reachable deployments. The CVSS vector requires an authenticated attacker, reducing broad opportunistic risk compared with unauthenticated XSS.

Exploitation context

The source bundle says remote attack is possible, but does not cite active exploitation. The CVE is not listed as KEV in the provided data. No public exploit status beyond the vulnerability description is supported here.

Researcher notes

The public description lacks the exact vulnerable parameter or code path, so validation should rely on version control diff review and controlled regression testing. Do not assume other Doc2k products or RE-Chat versions are affected without separate evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply the referenced upstream patch commit if running RE-Chat 1.0.
  • Check the project or vendor repository for any later maintenance guidance.
  • Restrict RE-Chat access to trusted authenticated users where possible.
  • Prioritize replacement or upgrade if the project is unmaintained.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory systems for Doc2k RE-Chat 1.0 deployments.
  • Confirm whether re_chat.js includes commit bd17d497ddd3bab4ef9c6831c747c37cc016c570.
  • Review exposed RE-Chat instances and authentication boundaries.
  • Run safe XSS regression testing in a controlled environment.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2016-15035 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4 (2.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4CVSS 2.0MediumAV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N82.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 2.0 score

4Medium
CVSS 2.0 vector shape for CVE-2016-15035Access VectorAccess ComplexityAuthenticationConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N

Access Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocal
Access Complexity
LowMediumHigh
Authentication
NoneSingleMultiple
Confidentiality Impact
CompletePartialNone
Integrity Impact
CompletePartialNone
Availability Impact
CompletePartialNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Doc2kRE-Chat1.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.