LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2016-10690: openframe-ascii-image module is an openframe plugin which adds support for ascii images via fim.

openframe-ascii-image module is an openframe plugin which adds support for ascii images via fim. openframe-ascii-image downloads resources over HTTP, which leaves it vulnerable to MITM attacks. It may be possible to cause remote code execution (RCE) by swapping out the requested resources with an attacker controlled copy if the attacker is on the network or positioned in between the user and the remote server.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysisunknown

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This vulnerability affects the openframe-ascii-image Node module. It retrieves resources over unencrypted HTTP, so a network-positioned attacker could tamper with what the module receives. The sources say this may lead to remote code execution, but they do not provide CVSS scoring, confirmed exploitation, or a named patched version.

Executive priority

Prioritize discovery and removal where the module is used in production or network-exposed systems. The business urgency comes from possible RCE, but the rating remains uncertain because the sources lack CVSS, exploit confirmation, and patch details.

Technical view

CVE-2016-10690 is a CWE-311 issue in all versions of openframe-ascii-image. The module downloads resources over HTTP, allowing man-in-the-middle substitution of attacker-controlled resources. The published description states RCE may be possible when an attacker is on-path. Patch details are not provided in the supplied sources.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to environments that install or run the openframe-ascii-image Node module, especially where plugin resource downloads can traverse untrusted or interceptable networks. The source bundle lists all versions as affected.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not report active exploitation, and KEV is false. Exploitation requires an attacker positioned on the network path or between the user and remote server, with the ability to replace HTTP-fetched resources.

Researcher notes

Evidence is narrow but clear on the root cause: insecure HTTP transport for downloaded resources. The affected scope is stated as all versions. No exploit, fixed release, or detailed remediation is included in the supplied sources, so validation should focus on dependency presence and network exposure.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory applications, images, and lockfiles for openframe-ascii-image.
  • Check the referenced advisory and vendor guidance for remediation status.
  • Remove or replace the module if no maintained fixed version is available.
  • Restrict runtime network paths that allow insecure HTTP resource retrieval.
  • Treat retained usage as an exception with documented compensating controls.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether openframe-ascii-image appears in dependency manifests, lockfiles, or SBOMs.
  • Verify production artifacts do not include the vulnerable module after remediation.
  • Review runtime behavior for insecure HTTP resource downloads by the plugin.
  • Confirm network controls limit on-path tampering risk for any retained usage.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-311: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2016-10690 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
HackerOneopenframe-ascii-image node moduleAll versionsListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-311 · source CWE mapping

Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data

Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.