LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2016-10681: roslib-socketio - The standard ROS Javascript Library fork for add support to socket.io roslib-socketio dow...

roslib-socketio - The standard ROS Javascript Library fork for add support to socket.io roslib-socketio downloads binary resources over HTTP, which leaves it vulnerable to MITM attacks. It may be possible to cause remote code execution (RCE) by swapping out the requested resources with an attacker controlled copy if the attacker is on the network or positioned in between the user and the remote server.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE affects the roslib-socketio Node module, a ROS JavaScript library fork. It downloaded binary resources over plain HTTP, so a network attacker could replace those resources in transit. The source says this may lead to remote code execution, but no public exploitation or patch details are provided.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted dependency risk, not a broad internet-exposed emergency. Prioritize review where ROS-related JavaScript tooling supports production robotics, safety-sensitive systems, or privileged build pipelines.

Technical view

CVE-2016-10681 is a CWE-311 issue in all versions of the roslib-socketio node module. The vulnerability is insecure HTTP retrieval of binary resources, enabling man-in-the-middle tampering by an attacker positioned between the user and remote server. Reported impact is possible RCE if substituted resources are executed or consumed unsafely.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to projects that use the roslib-socketio node module, directly or transitively. Risk is highest during install, build, or runtime paths that fetch binary resources over HTTP on untrusted networks.

Exploitation context

The CVE source describes a man-in-the-middle condition and possible RCE, but KEV is false and the bundle provides no evidence of active exploitation, public exploit tooling, or confirmed real-world compromise.

Researcher notes

The available record lacks CVSS, patch status, exploit status, and detailed affected version ranges beyond all versions. Analysis should stay focused on dependency presence, HTTP resource retrieval, and network-positioned tampering risk.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory direct and transitive use of roslib-socketio.
  • Check vendor and advisory guidance for any maintained replacement or fix.
  • Avoid untrusted networks for affected install or build workflows.
  • Use trusted internal package and artifact caching where feasible.
  • Replace the dependency if no supported secure version exists.

Validation and detection

  • Search dependency manifests and lockfiles for roslib-socketio.
  • Confirm whether any build or runtime process downloads resources over HTTP.
  • Review CI and developer network paths for exposure to interception.
  • Check advisory sources for patch or deprecation updates.
  • Document affected applications and compensating controls.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-311: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2016-10681 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
HackerOneroslib-socketio node moduleAll versionsListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-311 · source CWE mapping

Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data

Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.