Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
serc.js downloads binary resources over plain HTTP. If someone can intercept that network traffic, they may replace the downloaded resource with malicious content, potentially leading to code execution where serc.js is used.
Executive priority
Prioritize review if serc.js exists in CI or developer automation. The practical risk depends on network positioning, but potential code execution during tool setup or testing can affect build integrity.
Technical view
CVE-2016-10678 affects all versions of the serc.js Node module, a Selenium RC process wrapper. The issue is insecure HTTP resource download, mapped to CWE-311. Sources describe possible RCE through resource substitution by an attacker positioned on the network path.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to environments that install or run the serc.js Node module. The source bundle lists all versions as affected, with greatest concern in CI, developer workstations, or test automation networks using untrusted HTTP paths.
Exploitation context
The bundle does not identify active exploitation, and KEV is false. Exploitation requires an attacker on the same network path or otherwise positioned to modify the HTTP download response.
Researcher notes
Evidence is sparse: no CVSS, no named patched version, and no KEV listing. The central issue is insecure binary retrieval over HTTP and possible resource replacement under MITM conditions.
Mitigation direction
- Inventory applications, CI jobs, and lockfiles for the serc.js dependency.
- Remove or replace serc.js where feasible, since all versions are listed affected.
- Avoid installing or running serc.js over untrusted networks.
- Check the Node Security advisory or vendor guidance for an approved fix.
- Restrict build and test network egress around legacy dependency downloads.
Validation and detection
- Search package manifests and lockfiles for serc.js.
- Identify CI and Selenium RC workflows that invoke serc.js.
- Confirm whether installs or runtime downloads use plain HTTP resources.
- Check vulnerability scanner results for CVE-2016-10678.
- Document any remaining business dependency on serc.js.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-311: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupExecution behavior lookup
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2016-10678 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Unknown
- CVSS
- Not scored
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS and timeline data
No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://nodesecurity.io/advisories/277CVE reference · x_refsource_MISC
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data
Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.
