LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2016-10649: frames-compiler downloads binary resources over HTTP, which leaves it vulnerable to MITM attacks.

frames-compiler downloads binary resources over HTTP, which leaves it vulnerable to MITM attacks. It may be possible to cause remote code execution (RCE) by swapping out the requested binary with an attacker controlled binary if the attacker is on the network or positioned in between the user and the remote server.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

frames-compiler can download binary resources over plain HTTP. A network-positioned attacker could replace the downloaded binary, potentially causing code execution during installation or use. This is mainly a software supply-chain and build-environment risk, not evidence of broad internet exploitation.

Executive priority

Prioritize review if this package appears in production build pipelines or developer onboarding scripts. The business risk is compromise of build hosts or developer machines, but urgency is lower without evidence of active exploitation.

Technical view

CVE-2016-10649 affects all versions of the frames-compiler Node module. The issue is CWE-311: sensitive transfer without encryption. The source bundle states HTTP binary downloads may be swapped by an attacker between the user and server, creating possible RCE. No CVSS score, patch, or KEV listing is provided.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to environments that install or execute the affected frames-compiler package, especially developer workstations, CI runners, or build systems using old Node dependencies.

Exploitation context

The cited evidence describes a man-in-the-middle condition: the attacker must be on the network path or otherwise able to alter the HTTP binary download. The source bundle does not show active exploitation or a public weaponized campaign.

Researcher notes

The evidence is sparse: affected scope is all versions, but no CVSS, fixed version, or exploit-in-the-wild claim is provided. Treat remediation as dependency removal or vendor-guided replacement unless additional authoritative package guidance is found.

Mitigation direction

  • Check vendor and package guidance for a safe replacement or removal path.
  • Remove frames-compiler from active projects if it is not required.
  • Avoid installing affected dependencies on untrusted networks.
  • Require TLS or trusted artifact mirrors for build-time binary downloads.
  • Restrict CI runners from fetching unauthenticated HTTP binaries.

Validation and detection

  • Search package manifests and lockfiles for frames-compiler.
  • Review SBOMs and dependency inventories for this module.
  • Check CI and build logs for frames-compiler installation or execution.
  • Confirm whether any build process fetches binaries over HTTP.
  • Record that KEV evidence is not present in the supplied sources.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-311: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2016-10649 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
HackerOneframes-compiler node moduleAll versionsListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-311 · source CWE mapping

Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data

Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.