Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2016-10641 affects the node-bsdiff-android npm module because it downloads resources over unencrypted HTTP. An attacker positioned on the network could potentially tamper with those downloads. The sources do not provide a CVSS score, patch version, or active exploitation evidence.
Executive priority
Prioritize review where the module is present in production build pipelines or release automation. The business concern is dependency tampering during software builds, but urgency is tempered by missing severity scoring and no cited active exploitation evidence.
Technical view
The issue is classified as CWE-311 and affects all listed versions of the node-bsdiff-android node module. The core weakness is use of HTTP for resource downloads, creating man-in-the-middle tampering risk during dependency installation or related build activity. Public sources do not describe exploit details or a vendor fix.
Likely exposure
Exposure is likely limited to environments that install or use node-bsdiff-android, especially build, CI, developer, or deployment systems that fetch its resources over a network.
Exploitation context
CISA KEV is false in the supplied bundle, and no cited source reports active exploitation. Practical risk depends on whether an attacker can intercept or modify network traffic during the module's HTTP download process.
Researcher notes
The evidence is sparse: description, affected package, CWE-311, all versions, and one historical advisory URL. Do not assume package ecosystem scope, patch availability, or exploitation without additional vendor-confirmed data.
Mitigation direction
- Inventory projects and build systems for node-bsdiff-android usage.
- Check the advisory and package/vendor guidance for remediation status.
- Remove the dependency if it is not business-required.
- Treat trusted-network builds as interim risk reduction, not a vendor fix.
Validation and detection
- Search dependency manifests and lockfiles for node-bsdiff-android.
- Review CI and build logs for installation of this module.
- Confirm whether any current vendor advisory names a patched version.
- Document affected repositories, build systems, and owner teams.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-311: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2016-10641 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Unknown
- CVSS
- Not scored
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS and timeline data
No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://nodesecurity.io/advisories/234CVE reference · x_refsource_MISC
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data
Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.