Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
apk-parser2 can fetch binary resources over plain HTTP. A network-positioned attacker could tamper with that download and potentially cause code execution. The public bundle does not provide CVSS, a confirmed patch, or active exploitation evidence.
Executive priority
Prioritize if apk-parser2 is present in CI, build, or automated APK-processing workflows. Potential RCE raises impact, but urgency depends on actual module use and network-path exposure.
Technical view
The issue is CWE-311: sensitive transport without encryption. The affected apk-parser2 Node module reportedly downloads binary resources over HTTP, allowing a man-in-the-middle to replace the fetched binary. Sources list all versions as affected and describe possible RCE under network interception conditions.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to environments using the apk-parser2 Node module, especially build, CI, developer, or APK-processing systems that allow outbound HTTP downloads.
Exploitation context
No KEV listing or cited source indicates active exploitation. Exploitation requires an attacker positioned on the network path or between the user and remote server during the HTTP binary download.
Researcher notes
Evidence is sparse: no CVSS vector, exploit confirmation, or patch details are present in the bundle. Validate package reachability and HTTP-fetch behavior before assigning emergency response status.
Mitigation direction
- Inventory projects and build systems for apk-parser2 usage.
- Check the Node Security advisory and vendor guidance for remediation status.
- Remove or replace apk-parser2 where business use allows.
- Limit outbound HTTP from build and APK-processing environments.
- Treat APK parsing hosts as higher risk until exposure is resolved.
Validation and detection
- Search dependency manifests and lockfiles for apk-parser2.
- Confirm whether any APK-processing workflow invokes the module.
- Review network logs for outbound plain HTTP downloads from those hosts.
- Verify remediation decisions against the cited advisory and current vendor guidance.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-311: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupExecution behavior lookup
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2016-10632 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Unknown
- CVSS
- Not scored
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS and timeline data
No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://nodesecurity.io/advisories/223CVE reference · x_refsource_MISC
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data
Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.