LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2016-10615: curses is bindings for the native curses library, a full featured console IO library.

curses is bindings for the native curses library, a full featured console IO library. curses downloads binary resources over HTTP, which leaves it vulnerable to MITM attacks. It may be possible to cause remote code execution (RCE) by swapping out the requested binary with an attacker controlled binary if the attacker is on the network or positioned in between the user and the remote server.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2016-10615 affects the npm curses node module. The module downloads binary resources over plain HTTP, so a network attacker could replace the download with a malicious binary. The public record says this may lead to remote code execution, but it does not provide a CVSS score, confirmed exploitation, or a named fixed version.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted dependency hygiene issue with high impact but conditional exploitability. Prioritize internet-facing build pipelines, CI systems, and developer environments that still install this legacy module.

Technical view

The issue is insecure transport for binary resource downloads in the curses node module. Because HTTP lacks server authentication and integrity protection, an attacker positioned on the network path could tamper with the binary fetched by the package. The CVE maps to CWE-311 and lists all versions as affected.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in Node.js projects that depend directly or transitively on the curses node module, especially where installs occur on untrusted or interceptable networks.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show active exploitation or CISA KEV listing. Exploitation is described as conditional: an attacker must be on the network path or otherwise able to intercept the HTTP binary download.

Researcher notes

The public evidence is sparse: all versions are listed as affected, with no CVSS vector, no confirmed exploit status, and no explicit fixed release in the provided sources. Do not assume broader product impact beyond the curses node module.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory direct and transitive use of the curses node module.
  • Check current vendor or package-maintainer guidance before choosing a replacement or fix.
  • Avoid fresh installs of affected versions on untrusted networks.
  • Prefer maintained alternatives that fetch artifacts over authenticated, integrity-protected channels.

Validation and detection

  • Search package manifests and lockfiles for the curses node module.
  • Confirm whether build or install workflows fetch binary resources for this package.
  • Review CI and developer install environments for network interception risk.
  • Check dependency scanners for CVE-2016-10615 findings and unresolved transitive paths.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-311: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2016-10615 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
HackerOnecurses node moduleAll versionsListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-311 · source CWE mapping

Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data

Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.